TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Single Payer Is Not a Principle- the Principle Is Universal Coverage

11 点作者 iamjeff将近 8 年前

5 条评论

trendia将近 8 年前
The three issues of healthcare:<p>1. Who has access to it?<p>2. How much does it cost?<p>3. Who pays for it?<p>This article mostly addresses (1) and somewhat (3), but doesn&#x27;t really give enough attention to (2). If pharmaceutical companies are granted a patent for a drug, then they have the sole capability to set the price, which the purchaser of the drug will be required to pay. The most obvious example is that of Martin Shkreli, who bought a patent for an <i>existing</i> drug and hiked the price.<p>How do you fight someone like Martin Shkreli who raises the price?<p>One option: don&#x27;t buy the drug until the price is lowered. Collateral: anyone who doesn&#x27;t have access to the drug. Problem: it is &quot;unethical&quot; to not pay for a drug that could save someone&#x27;s life. (That is, our emotional brains set the value of a life at infinity).<p>Another option: set price controls for drugs. Problem: pharmaceutical companies will inevitably lobby the government so that the &quot;right&quot; price control will be a very high one.<p>Yet another option: Remove patents altogether. Problem: This removes the incentive to produce pharmaceutical drugs with a low barrier to entry (which is practically all pharmaceutical drugs).<p>So, any discussion of healthcare that says we need &quot;universal coverage&quot; needs to balance all of these issues. So far, everyone seems to ignore (2).
评论 #15025037 未加载
评论 #15020591 未加载
评论 #15023749 未加载
评论 #15020780 未加载
评论 #15020442 未加载
评论 #15023751 未加载
评论 #15020781 未加载
gremlinsinc将近 8 年前
Why couldn&#x27;t hospitals.. create a union... where they negotiate together for better drug prices, AND they ALSO become the insurer-- your primary hospital is your insurer--you pay them monthly to keep you healthy. They get recurring income from sick&#x2F;healthy people alike, they get to control the costs...and they could set prices to be related to income...say 4% of income goes to healthcare... When someone travels to another hospital, their primary hospital picks up the bill...etc... I think costs could be a LOT lower because w&#x2F;out insurance agencies there&#x27;s more money for the hospital directly and being MRR the hospital can have a better idea of how much revenue they bring in on average per month.
评论 #15023756 未加载
Overtonwindow将近 8 年前
Paying for it will always be the problem, but not just who pays for it, but whom will be paid for those services. IMO the problem with today&#x27;s healthcare and insurance dilemma is that everyone wants to get in on the gravy train. Doctors, specialists, and everyone in between, are eager to take a fee. Pharmaceutical companies charge just about whatever they want because they know, eventually, they&#x27;ll get paid. Insurance is best left to the private market, because if it goes universal through the government, then there will never truly be any limitations on what is covered, how much is paid, and the system will collapse upon itself.<p>For those that want to draw parallels to other nations, please remember those nations tend to be considerably smaller than the U.S., and they&#x27;ve had a LOT longer to work on these problems.<p>For my two cents, healthcare in America could be greatly improved with the following:<p>1) No one gets turned down for insurance, no matter what. Even if it&#x27;s just basic prescription drug coverage, some basic level. 2) The cost of insurance is tied to your income, with the price gradually increasing as your wage increases so people are not forced to keep a low paying job for low paying insurance, unless of course that&#x27;s what they want. 2a) The longer you have continuous insurance the more coverage you get, and the lower your costs. Incentive people to get, maintain, and keep insurance. 3) A cap on the price of drugs that have been on the market for more than 2 years. 4) Exclusive patents on drugs no more than 4 years. 5) Insurance is available nationwide, portable, and covers you no matter where you live, work, or go. 6) Finally, if you cancel your insurance you may not reapply for insurance for six months. Stop people from dropping insurance and waiting to pick it up only when they need it.<p>There are a dozen holes you can poke in that, I understand, but it&#x27;s a start, and it&#x27;s a short law that I think many would agree with.
EwanG将近 8 年前
Article points out that the important thing is that everyone has healthcare that they can access as they need to. Many ways to get there, and Single Payer isn&#x27;t the only option. Rather partial to the German system myself...
payne92将近 8 年前
The real underlining principle is a question: Should healthcare be the responsibility of an individual, or a collective responsibility of a group?<p>Without some agreement on this principle, we will continue to spin our wheels.