TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Pixelmator Pro

14 点作者 OberstKrueger超过 7 年前

3 条评论

flixic超过 7 年前
I think it&#x27;s named &quot;Pixelmator Pro&quot; entirely because Mac App Store does not support paid upgrades.<p>Feature-wise Pro is not that major. It has an entirely different UI than Pixelmator 3.6. Long term, maintaining two different apps with very different UIs is not going to work. I wouldn&#x27;t be surprised if 3.6 remained as last version of non-Pro Pixelmator.<p>So why Pixelmator Pro and not just Pixelmator 4.0?<p>Pixelmator never charged for upgrades on Mac App Store, and as influx of new users inevitably decreases, they need to get more money from existing users. Options: Subscription, In-App Purchases, Leave Mac App Store, or separate new app on the App Store. Maybe Pixelmator 4. Pixelmator Pro sounds better and more worthy of a &quot;new&quot; app purchase.<p>Their messaging around 3.6 is very lacking and confusing, lack of paid upgrades on Mac App Store does explain everything.
评论 #15174547 未加载
评论 #15176406 未加载
dennyabraham超过 7 年前
It&#x27;s not clear from the FAQ[1] how this is different from a major revision to Pixelmator. Does anyone have any insight into what is the difference, if any?<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pixelmator.com&#x2F;pro&#x2F;faq&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pixelmator.com&#x2F;pro&#x2F;faq&#x2F;</a>
archagon超过 7 年前
Looks great, but I really hope they keep offering standalone pricing. I picked up Pixelmator (and have enjoyed using it) solely to get away from Adobe&#x27;s subscriptions, and I will continue my search if they move to a subscription model.