> <i>We’ve already figured out a lot about the structure and composition of good software</i><p>I can't satisfy myself with such a teaser. What have we figured out? Pointers, please!
Still relevant but apparently unknown to the trendy conference speakers and FP ranters:<p><a href="http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~hehner/aPToP/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~hehner/aPToP/</a>
We could start holding companies responsible for their products as opposed to suggesting they are blameless even in the face of shoddy software.<p>Right? That'd certainly add economic incentive to quality.