TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

On hygiene, intellectual and otherwise (1989)

78 点作者 awelkie超过 7 年前

8 条评论

ideonexus超过 7 年前
&quot;The Royal Surgical Society even issued a strongly worded Manifesto...&quot;<p>&quot;the Department of Defence declared a moratorium on all funding of sterilization research...&quot;<p>I can find no evidence that such a manifesto ever existed or that the DoD ever took such an action. When I search for these, the top link is this essay. I know there was resistance to sterilization, but I suspect Dijkstra may have been exaggerating it to make his point.
评论 #15277028 未加载
评论 #15277046 未加载
评论 #15278025 未加载
评论 #15276993 未加载
golergka超过 7 年前
It&#x27;s an exaggerated satirical version of real life history of practice of washing hands.<p>&gt; Despite various publications of results where hand washing reduced mortality to below 1%, Semmelweis&#x27;s observations conflicted with the established scientific and medical opinions of the time and his ideas were rejected by the medical community. Semmelweis could offer no acceptable scientific explanation for his findings, and some doctors were offended at the suggestion that they should wash their hands.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Ignaz_Semmelweis" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Ignaz_Semmelweis</a>
smaddox超过 7 年前
&quot;We know that no responsible scientist guesses his formulae but derives them...&quot;<p>Are you sure about that, Dijkstra? Richard Feynam seems to disagree:<p>&quot;In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First, we guess it (audience laughter), no, don’t laugh, that’s really true. Then we compute the consequences of the guess, to see what, if this is right, if this law we guess is right, to see what it would imply and then we compare the computation results to nature, or we say compare to experiment or experience, compare it directly with observations to see if it works.<p>If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are who made the guess, or what his name is… If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.”<p>- Richard Feynman
评论 #15280738 未加载
gumby超过 7 年前
Is that truly the history of the reaction to boiling instruments?<p>This part seems relevant today:<p>&gt; We know that no responsible scientist guesses his formulae but derives them...<p>I am troubled by the epistemological blankness of our age of multi-gigabyte mathematical proofs and inscrutable multilayer neural nets....
danielvf超过 7 年前
Since there&#x27;s a bit of confusion in the comments, this is a well done work of satire, taking things software developerment individuals and organizations have said, and showing their ludicrousness by having the medical profession say them.
russnewcomer超过 7 年前
Dijkstra seems to be overstating the Swift opposition to a very Modest Proposal.<p>n.b. this is a very certain kind of satire. It&#x27;s not a literal retelling of something that happened.
quickben超过 7 年前
Under &quot;otherwise&quot;, I suggest applying hygiene to the multitude ideas we have for projects.<p>Treat them as flowers in a garden. Cultivate some, weed out others. The most focus should be on the few that flourish best, and they&#x27;ll be products.
wrinkl3超过 7 年前
So what exactly is the intellectual hygiene he refers to? Being rational and overcoming one&#x27;s biases?
评论 #15279927 未加载