TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

'Creep Shots' is a worrying new trend targeting women in public

15 点作者 ophelia超过 7 年前

6 条评论

chisleu超过 7 年前
Are creepshots news? These threads on 4chan have been going on for as long as this oldf*g can remember.<p>Are we really willing to allow this to be considered &quot;sexual cyber violence&quot;?<p>Taking a photograph of someone in public is a legal act (in the USA anyway)? Being in public necessarily puts you into the public domain with no expectation of privacy.<p>Can we agree that taking photographs of people without their consent is nothing more than extremely creepy? This isn&#x27;t violence at all. That word is very dangerous. When misapplied, it leads the uninformed to make bad decisions, expecting that they can respond to &quot;sexual cyber violence&quot; with actual physical violence.
评论 #15284087 未加载
评论 #15286688 未加载
thanksgiving超过 7 年前
We have GCHQ taking over people&#x27;s webcams[1] using taxpayer money but of course that&#x27;s not a problem at all because we have much more &quot;important&quot; problems. I know Europe[2] has different standards of privacy but with Theresa May as the prime minister in London and a similarly evil person in charge in Australia, we really need to focus on what is important.<p>Sure, I don&#x27;t like invasion of privacy either. That being said, can I count on OP&#x27;s support for a campaign to get the governments to stop taking over our cameras and microphones?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Optic_Nerve_%28GCHQ%29" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Optic_Nerve_%28GCHQ%29</a> [2] I know Australia is not in European continent but it might as well be for all I care [3] And yes, of course I know Australia gained independence from the UK but it doesn&#x27;t matter for this conversation
richthegeek超过 7 年前
Hopefully this doesn&#x27;t lead to some overblown moral panic for an issue that is almost non-existent.<p>Photographers already have to be incredibly careful when shooting anywhere children (even fully clothed, rather than at a swimming pool) are present for fear of paranoid parents and overzealous police officers.<p>It&#x27;d be nice if I could phrase this in a way that doesn&#x27;t sound like a slippery-slope argument, although I suppose that could be indicative of something...
评论 #15283591 未加载
probably_wrong超过 7 年前
The article jumps around the issue so much, that I have no idea what the actual problem is (pictures of clothed women in public? The horror!).<p>Rater than flag it, here&#x27;s the link to the Urban Dictionary entry, (bluntly) explaining what they are actually talking about:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.urbandictionary.com&#x2F;define.php?term=creepshot" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.urbandictionary.com&#x2F;define.php?term=creepshot</a>
评论 #15283540 未加载
rodolphoarruda超过 7 年前
On the other side of the same scale there was Bill Cunningham.
评论 #15283450 未加载
nasredin超过 7 年前
IIRC we had the whole moral outrage over this a year or two ago.<p>Reddit ended up banning these folks. And of course, surprise, surprise, they rebranded into &quot;Fashion Advice&quot; and are still - hard - at it.