TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Von Neumann-Landauer limit

183 点作者 dedalus超过 7 年前

9 条评论

philipkglass超过 7 年前
The usual extropian retort to this limit has been &quot;reversible computing,&quot; but as far as I can tell there has been little work on reversible computing hardware -- far less than quantum computing. It looks like the University of Florida made some hardware in the early 2000s. Can anyone offer insights about why hardware research is so scarce here? Are there reasons to think it&#x27;s a dead end prior to fabricating anything?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Reversible_computing" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Reversible_computing</a><p>EDIT: searching Google Scholar, it looks like only ~50 papers&#x2F;books mention reversible computing in the past year, compared to 1000+ for quantum computing.
评论 #15375151 未加载
评论 #15376582 未加载
评论 #15375349 未加载
评论 #15376232 未加载
评论 #15378116 未加载
评论 #15375301 未加载
评论 #15375473 未加载
md224超过 7 年前
I picked up <i>The Information</i> by James Gleick when I was visiting the Living Computers Museum + Labs in Seattle[1]. Really interesting book... talks about the development of language, the birth of computing, the concept of randomness, the physics of information, etc. A fascinating and comprehensive overview of the topic.<p>[1] This place is awesome and you should check it out if you&#x27;re in the area: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.livingcomputers.org" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.livingcomputers.org</a>
emmelaich超过 7 年前
I remember reading Feynman&#x27;s thought experiment and him deciding that it doesn&#x27;t require <i>any</i> energy to flip a bit.[1]<p>How does that square with Landauer&#x27;s limit?<p>[1] Apologies for the lack of reference. I&#x27;ll try and find it.
评论 #15376035 未加载
评论 #15375813 未加载
评论 #15375687 未加载
guskel超过 7 年前
I believe there is some breakthrough yet to be found in the intersection of entropic gravity and computational limits.
评论 #15375212 未加载
deepnotderp超过 7 年前
As interesting as it is to think about the limit, it&#x27;s so pointless from a practical point of view since the cost of computation is dwarfed by the cost of data movement in modern machines.
agumonkey超过 7 年前
As inspiring as thought provoking.
评论 #15375069 未加载
shpx超过 7 年前
Related discussion<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=14002160" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=14002160</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=14146677" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=14146677</a>
davidivadavid超过 7 年前
Recently mentioned in Venkat Rao&#x27;s Breaking Smart newsletter.
bandrami超过 7 年前
So you&#x27;re telling me ignorance can combat global warming?