The term "implicit bias" is a poor choice here.<p>First, it only appears in the title, but not the abstract, for good reason: they are not talking about implicit bias, which as a concept only makes sense when contrasted with explicit bias. Humans can have implicit and explicit bias. An AI can just have "bias" (well, at least until we get true human-level general AI, and we'll be able to talk to it and differentiate what it does from what it says it does).<p>Second, "implicit bias" brings in a lot of unfortunate connotations. It is tied up with the IAT (implicit association test) [1], which is highly controversial. That controversy has no meaning here (again, since there is no explicit bias to contrast it to), it only hurts.<p>Unless I'm missing something, I can only guess that they use the term to grab attention, which is cynical and sad.<p>[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit-association_test#Criticism_and_controversy" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit-association_test#Crit...</a>