TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Post-Scarcity Economics (2013)

42 点作者 hocaoglv超过 7 年前

5 条评论

baron816超过 7 年前
The problem we have now is not that there isn’t enough for everyone, it’s that we’re acting like that’s still the case.
评论 #15515359 未加载
评论 #15515393 未加载
评论 #15515395 未加载
评论 #15515327 未加载
评论 #15515607 未加载
评论 #15516648 未加载
评论 #15515647 未加载
ddnb超过 7 年前
An incredible article, it seems so clear the way it is stated.<p>If demand is the problem, as stated in the article, would a basic-income, providing extra income and arguably more free time for consumers usher in a new &quot;Golden Age&quot; of growth as we have seen post-WWII?
评论 #15515515 未加载
评论 #15516514 未加载
francisofascii超过 7 年前
Media seems to be a good example of this. Movies and TV shows continue to be created and preserved increasing the supply, but consuming media does not mean less for others.
wyager超过 7 年前
Scarcity is imposed by physics. Energy is conserved, entropy increases. Even if we realized the wildest extropian dreams and moved all intelligent life into efficient simulations, physics still dictates that every non-reversible computation creates entropy.<p>A homeless person in the US today has universally better prospects than 99% of the population a thousand years ago; better than all of them in many ways. It’s impossible to starve in a first world country. Even the poorest of the poor are jacked into the global communication network. Necessary survival goods are non-scarce. Are we satisfied? No, we want more. As productive capacity increases, our definition of non-scarcity becomes more and more demanding. I don’t see why this would stop if the only commodity left was mass-energy.
kiliantics超过 7 年前
I recommend people interested in alternative social structures for a post-scarcity world to look into Murray Bookchin