TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Andrew Chen: Your ad-supported Web 2.0 startup is really a B2B enterprise in disguise

64 点作者 andrew_null大约 17 年前

3 条评论

aston大约 17 年前
Clever take on the situation. However, unlike a straight up B2B play, you do still have a huge chunk of your company doing B2C work, and the more good you do in the latter, the easier the former gets.<p>Ask the engineers at Google and Facebook whether they feel like they're unimportant even though they're not directly bringing in the money for their company.
henning大约 17 年前
"You have to make your product better not through superior technology, but often through superior PR, sales operations, or other non-geek issues"<p>Better sales/PR does not make what is being sold better. It is business development, not product development.
评论 #155240 未加载
评论 #155517 未加载
评论 #155284 未加载
评论 #155305 未加载
sabat大约 17 年前
I think Andrew's making a good point here -- if you can offer some sort of value-add to your customers, it'll help diversify your business. Virtual goods (have to be scarce and desirable!), extra services, special privileges all qualify.<p>But you don't need a gigantic avalanche of hits to make an ad-supported site work, <i>if</i> your goal is to make a business that adds some cash to your pocket or might be picked up by a large organization.<p>The days when every startup dreamed of IPO and sky-high revenues are over. Most of us, I dare say, aren't shooting for that at all.<p>Yes, plentyoffish (god's favorite example) does make millions per year from ads. Like $9 million. I don't need $9 million. $2 million would be fine. Selling the business for $9 million would be even better.