Dead People Mysteriously Support the FCC's Attack on Net Neutrality

This makes sense, actually. Dead people tend to be older, and have less stake in newer bandwidth-intensive applications.

Being we've had foreign governments messing with our democracy using social media and hacking, this should be fully investigated. I'm not claiming they are interfering, only saying we should rule out the possibility using our best forensics.

Why doesn't someone do the same thing but for net neutrality? Just make a bot to spam with fake or dead names in favor of neutrality to balance it out. The FCC apparently won't do anything either way so why not

&gt; However, if you go to his house on 11 Tee Pee Row, you will unfortunately speak to a kind person who will tell you that John has been passed away since 2016 and no one else there has the same name.<p>This is my new favorite name for a residential street.

It is fairly clear at this point that FCC as an agency is a captive of business interests.<p>It should be treated as openly hostile to the interests of the general public.

I&#x27;d just like to point out, hopefully without being accused of shilling, that part of Net Neutrality legislation involves the quiet reclassification of ISPs as title ii common carriers.<p>These are regulations designed for phone companies in the 1930s. Why should you worry? Because all network traffic will be subject to extremely broad obscenity laws.<p>I will try to find the legislation shortly, but effectively, causing &quot;offense&quot; or transmitting &quot;obscene&quot; material gives the federal government an excuse to prosecute you.<p>Suddenly, posting on 4chan can get you thrown in prison.<p>Edit: found it[0], I dont understand why no one is aware of this. I plead that you take a moment to check the link, as this is a dangerous extension of government power, especially in combination with current surveillence.<p>[0]<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.law.cornell.edu&#x2F;uscode&#x2F;text&#x2F;47&#x2F;223" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.law.cornell.edu&#x2F;uscode&#x2F;text&#x2F;47&#x2F;223</a>

Can we acknowledge we live in a dystopian era yet? What further has to happen?

After saying that, yeah, an investigation is due...maybe laws were broken, but I can say that I used a dead person name as a way to be anon.<p>In the end this should not matter, FCC is not running a vote. If they count pro &#x2F;against this way then it&#x27;s their problem. Arguments should be the only deciding factor.

Well if dead people can come up with insightful comments, then great. These are comments, not votes. Once all the possible ideas have been presented, there is no point in further comments.<p>In the end only actual politics matters. If you want to do a petition then do a partition. If you want to complain then target a politician.