TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The $280M Ethereum bug

30 点作者 kushti超过 7 年前

5 条评论

ecesena超过 7 年前
Discussion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=15642856" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=15642856</a>
Legogris超过 7 年前
Misleading title. This was not a bug in Ethereum, but in the code for a particular popular multi-sig wallet people use on Ethereum. I don&#x27;t mean to trivialize it, but this is kind of like saying &quot;Bitcoin was hacked&quot; when MtGox went down.
评论 #15647894 未加载
Zamicol超过 7 年前
It&#x27;s not an ethereum bug, it&#x27;s a parity bug.<p>Ethereum worked exactly as coded.
评论 #15647835 未加载
45h34jh53k4j超过 7 年前
I dont think its fair to say a code review would have fixed this -- its an operational bug. They failed to initialise the library (ie: assigning ownership) after deploying it.<p>Last time the smart contract let anyone initialise it (which was a code problem).<p>Either way its pretty much the end of Parity. I bet those PolkaDot investors are going to be mad when their tokens are worthless!
viach超过 7 年前
Why didn&#x27;t they choose at least pure functional language for smart contracts? Imo that would reduce the amount of dramas...
评论 #15648042 未加载
评论 #15647877 未加载