TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

On Tokens 1.0 vs. Tokens 2.0 and Fundamental Blockchain Innovations

9 点作者 ALee超过 7 年前

1 comment

dreit1超过 7 年前
Fundamentally a token is good for helping to bootstrap a network effect. In my opinion Token 2.0 models should work as follows. Initial token distribution which seeds the initial network user base, and provides funding for development of the network. Then the token inflation rate should be proportional to network usage rate, where those that add value to the network get a portion of the generated tokens. This is a very general concept, but more concretely works in a model like STEEM as mentioned in the article. Content creation earns you tokens, but I believe the inflation rate is fixed as opposed to proportional to network activity.<p>The biggest fundamental which I think most people agree on is that Token Value is Proportional to Network Usage Rate. The minting of new tokens needs to reflect this value