TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Your Calendrical Fallacy Is

2 点作者 djanowski超过 7 年前

2 条评论

schoen超过 7 年前
A weird thing is that these intermix contemporary civil timekeeping issues with historical and religious calendar issues. If you're writing software or making statements about present-day civil time, you presumably don't feel contradicted by the idea that there are also other calendars in which your assumptions don't hold. Perhaps your software and statements won't apply when people want to use those other calendars. For example, it's easy to accept that GNU date doesn't claim to state the Jewish or Islamic month or year, nor the Japanese imperial regnal year, nor the Julian date that some Eastern Orthodox Christians continue to use for some religious purposes, nor the Roman year ab urbe condita.
cgore超过 7 年前
Your calendrical fallacy is ... not just using unix timestamps.