TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

An Inconvenient Truth about Smart Cities

120 点作者 imwally超过 7 年前

15 条评论

jesperlang超过 7 年前
We are a culture obsessed by the <i>how</i>, not the <i>why</i>. A picture of people walking or biking to work does not fit our idea of the &quot;future&quot; as well as one where we ride around in slick glass pods. We have grown custom to doing even the simplest things orders of magnitude less efficient than they need to be.<p>We are also a culture obsessed by image and impression. Look at the image at the top of this article. Images of futurist cities like this drive me nuts, am I looking at a pimped up motherboard or a city where people actually live? What if a sustainable and livable city doesn&#x27;t look very exciting on picture?<p>Cities are complex adaptive <i>social</i> systems that we are nowhere near fully understanding. Formulating a vision of a city with its base in a technological ideal (&quot;smart&quot;) just shows how disconnected you are from reality and how setup you will be for complete failure.
评论 #15728860 未加载
评论 #15728735 未加载
评论 #15728828 未加载
评论 #15730012 未加载
评论 #15729476 未加载
b0rsuk超过 7 年前
Ancient Greeks famously started new cities with a... city square, and built around it. This is because public matters were most important to them and focusing on private matters was the definition of egoism and a bad citizen.<p>Whenever I hear about another smart city project, it seems to be done for show. There are pictures of architecture, vegetation, various mechanical systems or circuits. As if people living there didn&#x27;t matter. Everyone will fit in and it will be great because concrete will do the thinking for you.
评论 #15728367 未加载
评论 #15728143 未加载
评论 #15728205 未加载
foobar1962超过 7 年前
Back in the day when Bill Gates was CEO of Microsoft and was hitting the big money, I remember hearing about his building a huge $5M house (when a million dollars was a million dollars) that would have digital-everything and be 100% buzzword compatible. This was probably the 1990s.<p>I&#x27;m wondering 1) how it went then; and 2) is the house now obsolete after just 20 years?<p>A house being obsolete in 20 years is one thing, but a whole city being obsolete is quite another.
评论 #15728264 未加载
评论 #15728089 未加载
评论 #15728120 未加载
评论 #15728444 未加载
评论 #15728339 未加载
js8超过 7 年前
The inconvenient truth about anything smart is that it actually takes a lot of caring and feeding from very few experts (expensive) who actually understand the technology.<p>The end result is that economic laws put practical limit on what you can achieve with smart. The smart aspect of things needs to generate enough savings for the economic entity to be able to muster the experts to fix things, as they inevitably break in various ways. And it only happens if the entity is large enough.<p>Every, say, home could be made smarter, and the total savings would be probably big. But we won&#x27;t do that as individuals, because for each of us, the cost of the expert is scary compared to the tiny savings that we can individually achieve with it. If we would organize (that is, create a larger economic entity), then perhaps it would be possible. But organization causes additional costs, too.
评论 #15729063 未加载
评论 #15728427 未加载
tonyedgecombe超过 7 年前
The inconvenient truth about existing cities is we have let them become completely dominated by technology, in particular the car.
Heliosmaster超过 7 年前
I&#x27;m not sure about either the skepticism or the enthusiasm: we have, throughout history, built cities according to the &quot;modern&quot; standard. From the greek squares, to medieval towns with only space for a small handcart, to the car-centric cities in the US. And as we go, we improve them based on our knowledge: will we get it &quot;right&quot; this time? Of course not! But that&#x27;s not the purpose of these projects. Can we try, see what comes out, and adjust as necessary?<p>Putting all these posts beforehand sounds to me like waterfall development, where cities are naturally built in an &quot;agile&quot; way. See Rome, for example :)
评论 #15728398 未加载
xvilka超过 7 年前
It is not only about connectivity. The smarter city becomes, the more question of privacy arise. While it shouldn&#x27;t be a stopper for further digitalization, cross-integration and overall efficiency tuning, putting it in the recipe should be done right now. I like the solution by Hannu Rajaniemi in his masterpiece Quantum Thief: every citizen in City of Mars had a complex &quot;gevulot&quot; (a complex set of a keychains, like in PKI), where he can decides what to share, with whom and for what time. There were news from Canada about designing similar system for national ID and other important documents. But the part of online-selection every time what to share is important in my opinion. We&#x27;ll see what future will make of that.
评论 #15742583 未加载
willvarfar超过 7 年前
I like Swedish cities because they are low-rise and had more trees, squares (usually triangles) and pedestrians. I particularly recall a wide tree-lined car-free avenue acting as a buffer zone between two parts of Malmö; people would take nice park walks in this elongated park just a few meters wide. I remember wishing that avenues like that radiated like spokes from the center so I could have had such a walk or cycle ride to work daily.
评论 #15728362 未加载
评论 #15729116 未加载
评论 #15728230 未加载
mamon超过 7 年前
To paraphrase Arthur C. Clarke: Any sufficiently advanced smart city is indistinguishable from prison.
jdonaldson超过 7 年前
There&#x27;s been numerous attempts at &quot;smart&quot; cities, even in Arizona. One example is Arcosanti: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Arcosanti" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Arcosanti</a><p>These things always sound amazing on paper. But they&#x27;re always a bit lacking in person.
keganunderwood超过 7 年前
If one person owns all the land, they (or someone they authorize) can boot anyone unwelcome. This makes life much simpler because you can sidestep a lot of issues and focus on what this really is: a pilot project.
评论 #15728216 未加载
评论 #15728117 未加载
评论 #15728314 未加载
nautilus12超过 7 年前
Whats the issue here. I think its implicitly obvious what style of government and particularly political affiliation these cities will have based upon who&#x27;s starting them. If you think there&#x27;s a chance that they will take anything from the playbook on the other side of the aisle, you are sorely mistaken. :P
baxtr超过 7 年前
Reminds me of the smart home, which I’m still waiting for
评论 #15729092 未加载
known超过 7 年前
Getto for the elite?
notyourday超过 7 年前
Yes, the current system is sooo much better. After all, it supports existence of Kendra L. Smith, the associate director of community engagement in the Center for Population Health Sciences at Stanford University its the lifestyle Kendra L. Smith is accustomed to.