TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Network Neuroscience Theory of Human Intelligence

115 点作者 marchenko超过 7 年前

5 条评论

Jeff_Brown超过 7 年前
Graphs (networks, webs) are a data structure we have not exploited enough. Tons of research is going into using graphs for artificial intelligence, and for understanding human intelligence (as in this article). But what about using knowledge graphs to augment human intelligence, like a prosthetic?<p>This is the power of Google search. It uses a knowledge graph that models the world (with an emphasis on the internet). The graph is big, but the view of it offered to users is minuscule -- in part to keep the interface as simple as possible, and in part for economic reasons.<p>There is open source software that lets people keep their own knowledge graphs. In Semantic Synchrony [1] you can keep a knowledge graph and merge it with others&#x27; knowledge graph. Joshua Shinavier (who wrote Semantic Synchrony) and I share a graph with over 400,000 nodes, and most views load in the blink of an eye.<p>A sister project, Digraphs with Text[2], offers a more flexible system of expression: It generalizes the graph, allowing relationships to involve more than two members, and allowing relationships to be members of other relationships. It also offers a search facility very much like natural language: To search, for instance, for reasons neurons need vitamin B, you would use a query like &quot;(neurons #need vitamin B) #because &#x2F;it&quot;. (The # mark indicates a joint between members of a relationship.)<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;synchrony&#x2F;smsn&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;synchrony&#x2F;smsn&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;</a> [2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;JeffreyBenjaminBrown&#x2F;digraphs-with-text" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;JeffreyBenjaminBrown&#x2F;digraphs-with-text</a>
评论 #15810068 未加载
评论 #15811161 未加载
评论 #15811362 未加载
评论 #15810658 未加载
neom超过 7 年前
This is an awesome lecture that really helps understand how the brain works at a neurological level:<p>Jack Gallant - Working toward a complete functional atlas of the human brain - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Z0Qiq22PRWQ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Z0Qiq22PRWQ</a>
forapurpose超过 7 年前
A psychology professor once said to me that throughout history our theories of the mind tend to analogize the dominant research paradigm of the time. At one time it was chemistry, then physics, and now it&#x27;s computer science.<p>I write that because it suggests that our theories of mind depend our own perspectives to a great degree - perhaps in their conclusions, or in how we describe them, or in our choice of research. (I wish I could remember the chemistry or physics analogies ATM.)
评论 #15810113 未加载
评论 #15810858 未加载
iraphael超过 7 年前
This is going a little over my head. Can anyone with more expertise help summarize &#x2F; ELI5?
评论 #15808235 未加载
评论 #15809108 未加载
curuinor超过 7 年前
This would actually indicate that spearman&#x27;s g cannot distributed ~Gaussian. CLT wouldn&#x27;t apply, anyhow, but positive feedback effects (a la small world RG) would apply. Very SFI sort of thing