R.J. Lipton - A proof that P is not equal to NP

Reading Lipton's description of this paper I think I understand how normal people feel when they listen to geeks talk about technology.

The paper is rather complicated, you can see it here <a href="http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Vinay_Deolalikar/#s.p" rel="nofollow">http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Vinay_Deolalikar/#s.p</a>. on the author's site.<p>it would be nice to believe this is solved, but my gut instinct is that it will not be vetted.

This was also good the last three times today it appeared on HN. :)

[jokingly] Would be interesting to know, what Does Perelman think about the proof? At least it is not from math community, so probably it is ok to take the million...