TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Decentralized Web Primer

401 点作者 xwvvvvwx超过 7 年前

14 条评论

blunte超过 7 年前
Could be that I'm just really out of touch, but I need at least one paragraph saying "What is this?" (and ideally also, "Who is the target audience?" - or "Why would I be interested in reading this?")
评论 #15887958 未加载
评论 #15889077 未加载
评论 #15887918 未加载
评论 #15888824 未加载
评论 #15888374 未加载
评论 #15887863 未加载
throwaway2016a超过 7 年前
This looks really interesting and I look forward to reading it but IPFS is not the only player in the decentralized web game. One only needs to start typing &quot;IPFS vs&quot; in Google.<p>Perhaps &quot;An IPFS Primer&quot; would be a better title?
评论 #15888142 未加载
评论 #15888679 未加载
评论 #15895796 未加载
staunch超过 7 年前
&quot;The Decentralized Web&quot; is the WWW system Tim Berners-Lee invented and that we&#x27;re all using right now. It relies on the DNS and HTTP protocols. This new IPFS-based decentralized web is interesting but it&#x27;s not even a measurable percentage of web traffic today. Far from being &quot;The&quot;.<p>What we need more than anything is to actually realize the beautiful dream TBL had for the WWW. HN is one great example but there should be a million more.
评论 #15888616 未加载
评论 #15888656 未加载
评论 #15889230 未加载
评论 #15896816 未加载
评论 #15889032 未加载
评论 #15888692 未加载
mtgx超过 7 年前
How hard to censor is IPFS? It would be quite disappointing if we managed to switch everyone over to IPFS, and in the end, after all that effort (and the compromises we&#x27;d have to make compared to simply using centralized content), governments would remain quite effective at censoring IPFS content.<p>Could ISPs throttle or block IPFS content, for instance? The developers should start assuming some extremely aggressive environments, like China, and then go from there, because honestly, we don&#x27;t know if 20 years from now a lot more governments would see China&#x27;s censorship as a role model to follow. We&#x27;re already seeing multiple countries in Europe considering it to stop &quot;extremist content&quot;, the IPSs in Canada are now banding together to block pirated content, and the US is probably not going to be too far behind after the repeal of the net neutrality rules. And those are just the &quot;democratic&quot; countries. It&#x27;s obviously much worse for Middle Eastern or African countries already.<p>So I just hope the IPFS developers will always try to develop the platform from an extreme resilience point of view.
评论 #15887934 未加载
评论 #15888276 未加载
评论 #15888134 未加载
gtirloni超过 7 年前
I don&#x27;t have any experience with IPFS so I just downloaded the client and ran `ipfs daemon`. It&#x27;s been using 500-1500Kbps down and 200-500Kbps up for the last 15min or so. It also has 330+ open connections. Is that expected? It seems a bit aggressive for idling. No message on the console indicating what exactly it&#x27;s doing either.
评论 #15888500 未加载
harperlee超过 7 年前
Decentralization is frequently sold as a means against censorship: if we use a decentralized system such as IPFS, we don&#x27;t need to have a DNS hierarchy to serve content, so it is no longer viable to block a particular domain.<p>But as long as we have ISPs and a common communications architecture, if we start using a content-addressable system, doesn&#x27;t that help censorship? As a censor, I jump from having to censor all domains that may serve one particular document (which is difficult, as we can see with pirate bay), to just having to force ISPs to block urls with the hash of the document that I want to censor.<p>So we go from having to jump among domains, to having to jump among content hashes, which seems much less practical, isn&#x27;t it?<p>In my mind, until we have some sort of mesh network with efficient cache systems, the decentralization topic seems (to me) that is providing answers to the wrong questions.
评论 #15890971 未加载
评论 #15891008 未加载
评论 #15891058 未加载
hossbeast超过 7 年前
One thing I&#x27;ve never understood is how IPFS would serve dynamic content. Like imagine building amazon.com on IPFS how would that work? Every single page served would have Different hash, because the content is always changing.
评论 #15888654 未加载
评论 #15888780 未加载
评论 #15888537 未加载
oskarth超过 7 年前
&gt; To build the HTML, PDF, epub and mobi versions of the book with one command, run .&#x2F;build-book.sh<p>Is it built as a one page anywhere already? Seems weird not to include this by default.
Jommi超过 7 年前
Here&#x27;s a pretty cool talk on the subject as well by Andre Staltz. It&#x27;s nothing groundbreaking, but just simple facts he puts on the table to show what the current situation is.<p>Highly recommend.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;qZDJ1z0apVk?t=7786" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;qZDJ1z0apVk?t=7786</a><p>Disclaimer: I helped organize the event where this talk is from.
评论 #15891176 未加载
bababooey超过 7 年前
The biggest advantage of centralization is the ability to delete something from the normie web and have it deleted.<p>Granted, nowadays you have things like the internet archive, but I don&#x27;t see normal people going along with IPFS for dynamic content like social media as long as you cannot delete things.
评论 #15896925 未加载
riston超过 7 年前
Not sure but didn&#x27;t get any information about how the data is stored between the nodes. Does each node keep full state and synchronize when connected to the network(similar to blockchain), or is the data split between available nodes? Could someone clarify the storage part?
aqsheehy超过 7 年前
Unless your project needs censorship resistance, you can probably ignore this.
评论 #15888903 未加载
评论 #15890505 未加载
golemotron超过 7 年前
Poor name. The web is already decentralized.
distagon超过 7 年前
The one who comments below does not live in China.