TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How the US Pushed Sweden to Take Down the Pirate Bay

701 点作者 pawal超过 7 年前

36 条评论

cup-of-tea超过 7 年前
The copyright industry has had far too much power for many years now. But when I talk to people about this nobody cares. For most people the products of this industry are just &quot;content&quot; which they use to waste their time so I suppose it makes sense that they don&#x27;t care too much about it. The tragedy is that the copyright industry controls a large and continually growing part of our culture and their power is only increasing.<p>I was there when a UK music tracker called OiNK&#x27;s Pink Palace was shut down. The police raided the home of the site owner before dawn and even the home of his father who had no idea what his son was up to. Copyright industry writers wrote the news article, claiming it was &quot;extremely lucrative&quot; and included gems such as &quot;Within a few hours of a popular pre-release track being posted on the OiNK site, hundreds of copies can be found&quot;.<p>The site&#x27;s owner was found not guilty in court several years later, but not before the copyright industry essentially ruined his life.<p>But how does this happen? If you talk to most people they don&#x27;t understand copyright at all. They think it&#x27;s some kind of privileged status that you have to pay for, like a trademark or something. Most people are not even aware that they hold copyrights. And why would they? Can the average person summon the police to help protect their copyright? Of course not. It&#x27;s not even a criminal matter. The police being involved seems nothing short of corruption.
评论 #15922248 未加载
评论 #15921498 未加载
评论 #15924059 未加载
评论 #15923563 未加载
评论 #15924230 未加载
评论 #15924871 未加载
评论 #15922392 未加载
评论 #15927551 未加载
评论 #15921883 未加载
评论 #15921378 未加载
评论 #15923087 未加载
评论 #15928816 未加载
coldtea超过 7 年前
&gt;<i>At the time there were some rumors that Sweden would be placed on the US Trade Representative’s 301 Watch List. This could possibly result in negative trade implications. However, in a cable written April 2006, the US Embassy in Sweden was informed that, while there were concerns, it would not be listed. Not yet at least. “We understand that a specialized organization for enforcement against Internet piracy currently is under consideration,” the cable reads, while mentioning The Pirate Bay once again.</i><p>Typical, not so subtle, blackmail.<p>One wonders what would happen if, say, the leader of some disclosure website was residing in Sweden and a superpower wanted him...<p>(From a comment below on TPB case: &quot;The judge was Thomas Norström. Swedish public radio revealed that the judge, Thomas Norström, is a member of several copyright protection associations, whose members include Monique Wadsted and Peter Danowsky – attorneys who represented the music and movie industries in the case. According to the report, Judge Norström also serves as a board member on one of the groups of which Mrs. Wadsted, the Motion Picture Association of America’s attorney, is a member.&quot; -- hurray for independent justice in any case..)
评论 #15921681 未加载
评论 #15921553 未加载
ckastner超过 7 年前
It never ceases to amaze me how much influence the MPAA has.<p>Movies, while extremely popular, don&#x27;t generate <i>that</i> much money: in 2016, total box office results in the US were under $12bn [1]. That&#x27;s <i>the entire industry</i>.<p>Apple alone makes that much money in three weeks&#x27; time.<p>Amazing, that you can apply such pressure to politics, with so little.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.statista.com&#x2F;statistics&#x2F;187069&#x2F;north-american-box-office-gross-revenue-since-1980&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.statista.com&#x2F;statistics&#x2F;187069&#x2F;north-american-bo...</a>
评论 #15921618 未加载
评论 #15921517 未加载
评论 #15921395 未加载
评论 #15923197 未加载
评论 #15921454 未加载
评论 #15923946 未加载
jakobegger超过 7 年前
And despite all these efforts, I&#x27;m still a happy user of the pirate bay whenever I want to watch something that I can&#x27;t find on iTunes or Amazon. For me, the Pirate Bay has been the most reliable way to find stuff over the last years, for so many things it&#x27;s still better than all the paid alternatives that I use.<p>So much money wasted on futile attempts to suppress a website...
评论 #15921074 未加载
评论 #15921375 未加载
评论 #15924457 未加载
评论 #15921188 未加载
评论 #15924597 未加载
评论 #15921392 未加载
评论 #15921031 未加载
评论 #15921104 未加载
评论 #15927072 未加载
ploggingdev超过 7 年前
If you&#x27;re interested in learning more about The Pirate Bay, the founders and the trial, watch the documentary called TPB AFK (The Pirate Bay : Away From Keyboard) : <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=eTOKXCEwo_8" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=eTOKXCEwo_8</a><p>One of the founders of TPB, Peter Sunde started:<p>* Njalla (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;njal.la&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;njal.la&#x2F;</a>) - a privacy focused domain registration service<p>* Flattr (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;flattr.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;flattr.com&#x2F;</a>) - a tipping&#x2F;micropayment service to support content creators<p>* A VPN service - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ipredator.se&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ipredator.se&#x2F;</a><p>Another link that you might find interesting, his interview with Vice : <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;motherboard.vice.com&#x2F;en_us&#x2F;article&#x2F;qkjpbd&#x2F;pirate-bay-founder-peter-sunde-i-have-given-up" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;motherboard.vice.com&#x2F;en_us&#x2F;article&#x2F;qkjpbd&#x2F;pirate-bay...</a>
评论 #15925404 未加载
评论 #15921073 未加载
beloch超过 7 年前
I&#x27;m sure there are many reading this who have absolutely no sympathy for pirates. They&#x27;re stealing and that&#x27;s that.<p>Well, how do you feel about your government blackmailing, extorting, or otherwise &quot;strong-arming&quot; other sovereign nations in order to foist its laws upon them and then hiding that from you? (It really is a minor miracle this cable was released <i>at all</i>.) Is it truly worth stooping to such measures to ensure that Micky Mouse remains copyright protected for all time <i>everywhere</i>? Don&#x27;t other nations have the right to make their own laws? How would you feel if some other nation foisted it&#x27;s laws on the U.S. in such a manner? Why does the U.S. government go to such extremes for private enterprise anyways?[1]<p>Piracy is bad. What the U.S. government has done in response is worse.<p>[1]I suggest you google the United Fruit Company&#x27;s history the next time you&#x27;re eating a Chiquita banana for a <i>real</i> eye opener.
评论 #15922530 未加载
评论 #15925346 未加载
评论 #15923780 未加载
realusername超过 7 年前
I remember the piratebay trial being a gigantic farce where some of the judges had ties to copyright organisations. It&#x27;s crazy how much power have these mafia-like organisations.<p>(edit: spelling)
评论 #15920885 未加载
评论 #15920920 未加载
thomastjeffery超过 7 年前
Let&#x27;s get one thing straight: Torrent sites <i>do not host content</i>. They host <i>community</i>.<p>The only thing thepiratebay.org, what.cd, kickasstorrents.cr, etc. did or continue to do is the <i>same</i> that a forum or news site like reddit or hackernews does: provide a community with a purpose.<p>While hackernews is a community for discussing news or interesting things, etc. WhatCD was a place for discussing music, quality releases, and sharing good encodings, rather than the transcoded lossy-&gt;lossy formats you see flying around most places. Naturally, WhatCD&#x27;s <i>as a community</i> wasn&#x27;t concerned with things like copyright owner&#x27;s profits, etc., even though many of its users certainly were, but <i>simply couldn&#x27;t find an alternative</i>, as a lot of music is not even to be found, let alone sold in particularly high quality lossless formats.<p>When what.cd was taken down, <i>none</i> of the copies of <i>copyrighted content</i> were deleted. The <i>community</i> was broken up.<p>If piracy is to be considered such a serious crime, taking down torrent trackers is like going to a meeting of known criminals, and - rather than arresting them - evicting them. It has only a minimal effect, as they are free to gather elsewhere.<p>What bothers me the most is that the only thing being dismantled is the thing that clearly contains the most value to individuals, and society at large. Community is a <i>good thing</i>.<p>When WhatCD was taken down, a countless amount of valuable data that could be found practically nowhere else was suddenly destined to be hidden from society at large, and the community it had cultivated was scattered, without a care for what that meant.<p>Sure, quite a few people find that, while using copyright enforcement as a business model, piracy significantly detracts from sales. Sure, there is a culture that undervalues creators, but it is not a black and white problem, and most popular solutions have serious consequences that go practically ignored.
pferde超过 7 年前
Got to love the &#x27;privacy&#x27; instead of &#x27;piracy&#x27; typo in the first cable screenshot:<p>&quot;2. Summary. In a visit to Sweden last month to raise the growing concerns about Internet privacy in Sweden, the Motion Picture Association of America (MPA), together with ...&quot;
评论 #15929549 未加载
upofadown超过 7 年前
Canada has been on the 301 watch list for a long time now. There have been some attempts to get off it (theatre camcording law) but it turned out that that the real reason a country is put on the list is a lack of fawning obedience to the US copyright cartel. A country that is perceived to not be toeing the line is put on the list. If there no actual policy reason to be there the copyright cartel just makes stuff up.<p>So these days the list is meaningless and is roundly ignored by Canada. Sweden probably should of did the same thing.
fsloth超过 7 年前
&quot;The new confessions of an economic hitman&quot; by John Perkins is a very good exposition of the close ties of state and corporate powers in the US and how they co-operate to increase the capital wealth of the elite.<p>It&#x27;s more autobiographical than a research document, and has some unproven claims, but no one has punched holes in the important claims there AFAIK.
jesperlang超过 7 年前
Wow, 10 years ago already? This was quite big here in Sweden back when it happened. It&#x27;s scary how quickly these things slip out of our conscience (at least mine). It&#x27;s chilling what you can get away with by just staying cool for while... Or is the short term damage in PR not worth waiting it out for the long?
dghughes超过 7 年前
People aren&#x27;t stupid they know it&#x27;s wrong to download a movie or music they didn&#x27;t buy. But everyone agrees the response by the US law enforcement is overreaching and out of proportion.<p>Convenience is the real reason people went to websites such as the Pirate bay not stealing, people don&#x27;t buy fast food for their health.<p>The rise of cheap and reliable streaming video websites such as Netflix changed that. That&#x27;s all anyone wanted a convenient reliable way to legally watch and pay a reasonable amount.
wimagguc超过 7 年前
To remove pirated movies from the interwebs there are two options really: either attack content providers &#x2F; trackers etc, or, find the users directly.<p>In Germany, as soon as you start a torrent client, your traffic is being monitored by bots and agents, and if you upload something inappropriate you (or your host) will get a letter from a law firm with a heavy fine. (I know of two friends who had to pay $600 and $3000.)
评论 #15920902 未加载
评论 #15921569 未加载
评论 #15921124 未加载
评论 #15921072 未加载
评论 #15921092 未加载
vinceguidry超过 7 年前
The copyright industry is a direct arm of American soft power projection into the rest of the world. For the content industry it&#x27;s about money, but for policy makers and the geopolitical strategists who have the ear of those policy makers, it&#x27;s about furthering the nation&#x27;s position in the world.<p>The content industry punches above its weight in getting the government to protect it overseas for this reason.
koliber超过 7 年前
Interesting aside: is the redacting technique vulnerable to an analogue of the &quot;timing attack&quot; on certain crypto?<p>The name of the employee in the wires has been redacted. I wonder if the physical size of the redacted box, together with the fact that this is a name, together with a database of public employees, could be used to uncover the identity of the person.<p>By comparing the size of the redacting box with the lines above and below, we can guess that 6-9 characters are masked out (including the space). This is an a rough parallel to a timing attack used against crypto. The DB of public employees could be thought of as a list of candidate inputs.<p>Weak redacting?<p>This reminds me of a law in Poland where a person accused of a crime can not be named. Media will blur out photos and state something to the effect of &quot;Mark W. an executive at XYZ Corp., stands accused of ...&quot;. If the accused is a well known actor with a unique first name, this becomes a running joke.
评论 #15922495 未加载
ksk超过 7 年前
It&#x27;s interesting that even after all the scummy things the movie industry has done, people still desperately want to pirate their content. People who base their opinion on a principled opposition to copyright, should be leading the charge in promoting other means of compensating content creators. Stop signalling how much you desire the copyrighted product, and start signalling how much you desire the non-copyrighted one! IMHO The only people who should be pirating are the people who don&#x27;t have a principled stance on copyright.
thriftwy超过 7 年前
I wonder why isn&#x27;t there torrent-search-over-DHT yet?<p>I mean, this is known point of vulnerability.<p>Maybe it&#x27;s because owners of popular bittorrent software don&#x27;t want that feature?
评论 #15922048 未加载
评论 #15924494 未加载
belorn超过 7 年前
Many interesting points which contradict the behavior of the lawyers of said MPA during the court hearings.<p>“However, it is not clear to us what constraints Sweden and even U.S. authorities would be under in pursuing a case like this when the site is legally well advised and studiously avoids storing any copyrighted material.”<p>A focus by the prosecutor was the claim that the founders did not have well legal advice. The idea was to prove to the court that the accused did the infringement knowingly and was aware that what they did was illegal. Here we can read that this supposedly obviousness of wrong doing was not so clear to the very high paid lawyers arguing it.<p><i>&quot;Both Bodström and Eliasson denied any direct involvement of the Justice Ministry with the work of the police and prosecutors in the Pirate Bay case.&quot;</i><p>That they surely did. It is very illegal for them to directly act in any specific legal case. If it ever was proven it would directly end any political carer. When similar document was earthened it was said that just because the US believe they influenced Swedish politicians it still doesn&#x27;t mean that they did it, so no proof of foul play has been made.
implosificated超过 7 年前
I wouldn’t be as miserably ashamed for this as I am, if it weren’t for the fact that the popular artists my country has produced since, oh... 1996? Aren’t worth defending from piracy.<p>You can harp on how there’s no accounting for taste, but the truth is that the industry this sort of thing protects certainly does account for taste, and only invests in the kind of lowest-common-denominator&#x2F;mass-appeal trash that makes them the most money.<p>And so, we are left to suffer the guilt trip that because we don’t adhere to an honor system of donating funds for better artists (paying and not pirating, copying, stealing, sharing, music and movies), we get the artists we deserve. But that’s clearly not true, because the money made off the garbage produced today, doesn’t make it into any kind of honor system that benefits the interests of better artists.<p>How about producers of bad music and movies demonstrate that they are willing to donate into the honor system first?<p>The profits that the industry sees are not reinvested. The artists, mysteriously, continue to worsen.
spodek超过 7 年前
The framers of the U.S. Constitution knew the risks of the government creating and granting monopolies, however limited. The incentives are to remove the limitations and expand them.<p>The industries formed by these government-granted and defended monopolies have removed most of their limitations and keep growing. We see the benefit to them. They make big blockbusters that people enjoy watching, so we see that benefit.<p>The costs keep growing too, such as this article and the deprivation from the public domain of nearly a century of work. Meanwhile, technology has lowered the costs of production and distribution, making investment for most works unnecessary, obviating the need for a monopoly.<p>Have the costs grown to outweigh the benefits? The monopolists&#x27; power can maintain the monopolies past when that point so it&#x27;s hard to tell, and people with different values will disagree, but this article points in that direction.
Feniks超过 7 年前
Still up though. I use it every once in a while because its on TOR. My ISP has to block some pirate sites now.<p>I&#x27;m from the generation that grew up with digital piracy. I am accustomed to have all media available. From nineties anime shows to strategy guides for videogames.
frabbit超过 7 年前
Why is the name of the official who spearheaded this initiative REDACTED?<p>Is this undercover, spy-type work as opposed to public, legal actions carried out by a legitimate government agency?
louhike超过 7 年前
I&#x27;ve discovered some days ago that the thepiratebay.org domain was available again. Is it linked to the original one or is it just a proxy?
评论 #15920874 未加载
评论 #15920857 未加载
评论 #15921643 未加载
l33tbro超过 7 年前
Funny, the &quot;brand equity&quot; of The Pirate Bay is really something. After over 10 years of use, there&#x27;s almost a nostalgic bond to the site for me now which makes the downloading of material a familiar ritual with only positive associations.<p>Not necessarily proud of this, just something I&#x27;ve noticed.
casualtech超过 7 年前
I don&#x27;t care indeed, but someone has to think about the potentials and ecosystem that it could lead. Don&#x27;t block the possibilities and help them to be in right way.
kwhitefoot超过 7 年前
&gt; U.S. authorities provide concrete suggestions for improvement<p>I don&#x27;t think improvement is quite the right word.
parski超过 7 年前
&quot;In your face, Hollywood.&quot;
paul7986超过 7 年前
With Net neutrality repealed say hello the blocking sites like this one .. well without a vpn.
scopecreep超过 7 年前
You mean the one I used last night to watch Dunkirk? Great detective work there Lou.
ketsa超过 7 年前
Amazing how Yankees are annoying g the whole world...
antigirl超过 7 年前
do people still use piratebay ? there are better alternatives now
评论 #15921684 未加载
评论 #15959052 未加载
ronjouch超过 7 年前
Honest question: why is this surprising &#x2F; newsworthy?
评论 #15920858 未加载
评论 #15920855 未加载
评论 #15920839 未加载
评论 #15922161 未加载
评论 #15920921 未加载
评论 #15920861 未加载
redm超过 7 年前
I don&#x27;t understand why there is so much controversy over this. I&#x27;ve been reading about the reasons TPB is a bastion of freedom for years and they read like a list of reasons its ok to cheat on taxes, or put recyclable materials in the compost bin. We all know its illegal in the US, we know TPB knows it, and instead of changing copyright laws, it is continually justified. It feels disingenuous.<p>I&#x27;m tired of the same conversation for the last 20 years.
评论 #15925541 未加载
评论 #15924146 未加载
jmull超过 7 年前
(rant, sorry in advance)<p>Eh, f--- Pirate Bay and everyone else who makes a living stealing the efforts of others.<p>(And F-you too if you&#x27;re a supporter&#x2F;user of theirs.)<p>Of course the various governments were stupid, clumsy, ham-fisted, and in the pockets of corporations. So what else is new?<p>How does that make it OK to steal stuff?<p>People want to talk about what total hipocrite jackasses they are (which is true) to deflect attention from the fact that they are casually and constantly taking stuff they don&#x27;t have a right to (also true, come on why don&#x27;t you want to talk about that?!?).<p>If you don&#x27;t like the terms, prices, availability, etc, of the Taxi reruns they are selling, well, then, don&#x27;t watch the Taxi reruns. Trust me, despite Danny Devito, you aren&#x27;t missing much. Likewise for all the pop music, old software, movies and virtually all the other content people are stealing through PB and similar.<p>Is this the stuff you really what you want to sell your integrity out for? Think about it.<p>If you all were mainly -- well, even just somewhat sporadically -- taking enlightening, high-quality stuff with an ounce or 1&#x2F;2 of cultural importance that was otherwise too expensive, then I might be able to understand. But no. You&#x27;re just mainly swiping bad superhero movies and video editing software that you&#x27;ll never learn to use.<p>I think we need to proceed on all the right paths here:<p>1. yes, the governments and their associated law-enforcement, and regulatory bodies are a-holes who are beholden to petty, stupid, obsolete, obnoxious corporate ip holders.<p>AND<p>2. Stealing is wrong (and that doesn&#x27;t change if you are stealing from 1.)
评论 #15930016 未加载
wildmusings超过 7 年前
And why shouldn&#x27;t the US have pressured Sweden to take down the Pirate Bay? The people running that site are openly and proudly flouting copyright laws and allowing American-owned (among other) content to be downloaded without payment to the owners.<p>Very large portions of the US economy are dependent on international enforcement of copyright and patent law. If the US isn&#x27;t using its leverage over other countries to make them enforce intellectual property laws, then it is failing to protect its citizens&#x27; economic security.
评论 #15921727 未加载
评论 #15921398 未加载