TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ash HN: What are you yelling about wrt Google/Verizon?

3 点作者 jobeirne将近 15 年前
From Google's Public Policy Blog, dated Aug. 09:<p>``Today our [Google and Verizon] CEOs will announce a proposal that we hope will make a constructive contribution to the [net neutrality] dialogue. Our joint proposal takes the form of a suggested legislative framework for consideration by lawmakers, and is laid out here. Below we discuss the seven key elements:<p>First, both companies have long been proponents of the FCC’s current wireline broadband openness principles, which ensure that consumers have access to all legal content on the Internet, and can use what applications, services, and devices they choose. The enforceability of those principles was called into serious question by the recent Comcast court decision. Our proposal would now make those principles fully enforceable at the FCC.<p>Second, we agree that in addition to these existing principles there should be a new, enforceable prohibition against discriminatory practices. This means that for the first time, wireline broadband providers <i>would not be able to discriminate against or prioritize lawful Internet content, applications or services in a way that causes harm to users or competition.</i><p>Importantly, this new nondiscrimination principle includes a presumption against prioritization of Internet traffic - including paid prioritization. So, in addition to not blocking or degrading of Internet content and applications, wireline broadband providers also could not favor particular Internet traffic over other traffic. ''<p>http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/search/label/Net%20Neutrality<p>So what's all of the rhubarb about?

1 comment

sabj将近 15 年前
The main contention is that although this is good news for wireline businesses, the real future growth in data is expected to be wireless, which is given a free pass from the "teeth" of this proposal.<p>Instead, the idea is just to let people "know" when they are being screwed over, basically, by having a sort of transparency around when things are unfair.<p>That's the fear, I believe... and the idea that Google has ceded too much in the proposal instead of fighting for the same kinds of provisions in the wireline proposal to exist across all kinds of data channels.