TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Regulator warns Bitcoin buyers: Be ready to lose all your money

27 点作者 dberhane超过 7 年前

7 条评论

Zak超过 7 年前
The headline sounds like a threat: &quot;we might take your money through regulatory action&quot;. The statement was actually that the value of cryptocurrency is volatile and it&#x27;s risky as an investment or store of value.<p>This is sound advice for someone who doesn&#x27;t know much about it and is only interested because they&#x27;ve heard about people making huge profits. It&#x27;s not news at all to most of the HN audience.
ipince超过 7 年前
Well there&#x27;s nothing new here.<p>Also, such poor headline. &quot;Be ready to lose all your money&quot; sounds like a threat. He really said &quot;be prepared to lose all your money&quot;, which sounds more like sound advice.
评论 #15935397 未加载
xster超过 7 年前
Title: &quot;The US Army: prepare to die! buahahhahahaha&quot;<p>Article: The US Army says if you&#x27;re facing imminent death due to natural or unnatural causes, the US Army is under no obligation to mobilize itself and somehow find the cure to cancer or perform other miracles to cure you.
thephyber超过 7 年前
This seems pretty late in the game. BTC was whitepapered in 2008 and implemented (in code and network) the same year.<p>If the intention of central banks is to &quot;protect peoples&#x27; investments&quot;, they should have warned about these concerns earlier.<p>At the risk of using Trump&#x27;s favorite &quot;ism&quot;, Wall Street and central banks don&#x27;t exactly have a great reputation for &quot;protecting peoples&#x27; investments&quot; either. In fact, the EU and the US federal government are enablers of the same crappy behaviors that encourage financial swindling and speculation.
评论 #15935281 未加载
评论 #15936502 未加载
jdlyga超过 7 年前
I only have the pure profits that I&#x27;ve made off bitcoin invested in bitcoin nowadays.
评论 #15935209 未加载
justifier超过 7 年前
Hoping to see a public statement about the uncertainty surrounding the foundational math of cryptographic hash functions instead it&#x27;s the same volatility argument where the response is &#x27;that&#x27;s why I&#x27;m interested!&#x27;
评论 #15936741 未加载
wyldfire超过 7 年前
<i>shrug</i>, please get in the queue.
评论 #15934836 未加载
评论 #15934828 未加载