TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

California employers prohibited from relying on an applicant's salary history

47 点作者 Thespian2超过 7 年前

16 条评论

Amorymeltzer超过 7 年前
Here&#x27;s an article from October: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sfgate.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;networth&#x2F;article&#x2F;New-law-bans-California-employers-from-asking-12274431.php" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sfgate.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;networth&#x2F;article&#x2F;New-law-bans...</a><p><i>AB168, signed Thursday by Gov. Jerry Brown, applies to all public- and private-sector California employers of any size. The goal is to narrow the gender wage gap. If a woman is paid less than a man doing the same job and a new employer bases her pay on her prior salary, gender discrimination can be perpetuated, the bill’s backers say.</i><p><i>Last year, the state passed a weaker law that said prior compensation, by itself, cannot justify any disparity in compensation. The new bill goes further by prohibiting employers, “orally or in writing, personally or through an agent,” from asking about an applicant’s previous pay. However, if the applicant “voluntarily and without prompting” provides this information, the employer may use it “in determining the salary for that applicant.”</i><p><i>Delaware, Massachusetts and Oregon have passed similar laws that take effect later this year or next, said attorney Ben Ebbink of Fisher &amp; Phillips in Sacramento. Philadelphia passed one that was supposed to take effect in May but is being challenged in court. New York City and San Francisco have similar ordinances that take effect Oct. 31 and July 1, respectively.</i>
评论 #15990253 未加载
amasad超过 7 年前
I&#x27;m generally skeptical of regulations but in this case I think it&#x27;s warranted because companies were basically &quot;price fixing&quot; by asking candidates about their previous salary and then matching or nudging up a bit.<p>This piece of regulation will make the market more efficient, dynamic, and fair too. Companies already have information asymmetry working to their advantage. Asking about salary history only increased that. And that&#x27;s why it&#x27;s unfair.
评论 #15990313 未加载
评论 #15990312 未加载
yandrypozo超过 7 年前
Just last month I had to search and present all my W-2s and last paychecks of my previous jobs in order to enter my new job. I cannot think on something more annoying and invasive than that. This regulation must be a national law.
评论 #15990416 未加载
评论 #15990489 未加载
评论 #15990497 未加载
评论 #15990464 未加载
dang超过 7 年前
Major discussions at <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=15502142" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=15502142</a> and <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=15846852" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=15846852</a>.<p>It&#x27;s good to look up such threads before reposting. You can do so like this:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hn.algolia.com&#x2F;?query=california%20salary&amp;sort=byDate&amp;dateRange=all&amp;type=story&amp;storyText=false&amp;prefix=false&amp;page=0" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hn.algolia.com&#x2F;?query=california%20salary&amp;sort=byDat...</a>
评论 #15993145 未加载
godelski超过 7 年前
If you want to get rid of equality, shouldn&#x27;t salaries of positions public? I&#x27;m not saying an exact number, but a range. This asymmetric information gives the employer a much larger edge in wage negotiation.
评论 #15990348 未加载
dsp1234超过 7 年前
Oregon also had this as of Oct 1st, 2017.<p>[0] - <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.oregon.gov&#x2F;boli&#x2F;TA&#x2F;Pages&#x2F;Equal%20Pay%20Law.aspx" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.oregon.gov&#x2F;boli&#x2F;TA&#x2F;Pages&#x2F;Equal%20Pay%20Law.aspx</a><p><i>&quot;Effective October 6, 2017 employers are prohibited from seeking the pay history of an applicant or employee from the applicant or employee or a current or former employer of the applicant or employee before the employer makes an offer of employment to the prospective employee that includes an amount of compensation;&quot;</i>
评论 #15990252 未加载
alex_young超过 7 年前
Also required: potential employers have to supply a pay range for the position if requested.
评论 #15990452 未加载
评论 #15990225 未加载
danjoc超过 7 年前
We learned from the Equifax breach that salary is part of the information collected.<p>&quot;So, it&#x27;s illegal to ask? Who cares, that guy&#x27;s just going to lie anyway. Let&#x27;s make him give us permission to check his credit report on the job application and get the exact number. Like we always did.&quot;
评论 #15990355 未加载
评论 #15990478 未加载
Thespian2超过 7 年前
Link to google cache of document, as current .gov website down for maintenance.
tapatio超过 7 年前
Now it&#x27;ll just be based off of years of experience, which is probably better.
ep103超过 7 年前
How does this apply to recruiters?
评论 #15990448 未加载
twostorytower超过 7 年前
&quot;What are your salary expectations?&quot; is a much more useful question.
zaidf超过 7 年前
Are they allowed to get salary history from data brokers like Experian?
matte_black超过 7 年前
What do you do if you are asked anyway?
评论 #15990412 未加载
评论 #15990275 未加载
评论 #15990303 未加载
评论 #15990455 未加载
jwilk超过 7 年前
Most people are not familiar with US state codes.<p>I, for one, assumed that this is about Canada.
评论 #15995815 未加载
评论 #15990364 未加载
tengbretson超过 7 年前
How could this possibly be constitutional?
评论 #15990426 未加载
评论 #15990512 未加载
评论 #15990563 未加载
评论 #15990282 未加载