TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Psychological and psychiatric terms to avoid

185 点作者 jgalvez超过 7 年前

11 条评论

herodotus超过 7 年前
I always imagined that a steep learning curve was metaphorically like a hill that took increasing energy with increasing slope. Turns out that the axes of a learning curve are learning on the y axis and experience on the x axis. So if the curve is steep, you learned stuff quickly. Many other good examples in the article. May the steep curve be with you.
评论 #16094443 未加载
评论 #16095415 未加载
评论 #16094284 未加载
评论 #16095511 未加载
评论 #16097131 未加载
评论 #16094282 未加载
Alex3917超过 7 年前
&gt; Gold standard. In the domains of psychological and psychiatric assessment, there are precious few, if any, genuine &quot;gold standards.&quot; Essentially all measures, even those with high levels of validity for their intended purposes, are necessarily fallible indicators of their respective constructs.<p>The reason we refer to double blind trials as being the &quot;gold standard&quot; isn&#x27;t to imply that they have some level of validity, but because they were popularized by Harry Gold.
评论 #16095792 未加载
评论 #16094778 未加载
评论 #16094774 未加载
评论 #16096770 未加载
评论 #16095262 未加载
maroonblazer超过 7 年前
&quot;We provide corrective information for students, instructors, and researchers regarding these terms...&quot;<p>I&#x27;m surprised they didn&#x27;t include &quot;the media&quot; in this list.
评论 #16095668 未加载
sideshowb超过 7 年前
I can&#x27;t help thinking that sometimes scientific and &quot;lay&quot; use of a word diverges beyond repair. With a linguistic hat on, who is to say who is right?<p>e.g. &quot;energy&quot;, &quot;weight&quot;, &quot;hacker&quot;, and within the linked article &quot;fetish&quot;. (In a sentence which also displays ignorance of the difference between smartphone and feature phone...)<p>The article is excellent, but I guess I&#x27;m saying in some cases you can try to re-educate while in others you just have to accept that there are multiple meanings of the same word.
评论 #16096630 未加载
aisofteng超过 7 年前
A tangential comment, but - what excellent styles of both writing and exposition!
YouAreGreat超过 7 年前
Quoting some Dawkins on what &quot;a gene for X&quot; means:<p>When a geneticist speaks of a gene &quot;for&quot; red eyes in <i>Drosophilia</i>, [...] he is implicitly saying: there is variation in eye colour in the population; other things being equal, a fly with this gene is more likely to have red eyes than a fly without the gene. That is all that we ever mean by a gene &quot;for&quot; red eyes.
tw1010超过 7 年前
&quot;Steep learning curve. Scores of authors use the phrase “steep learning curve” or “sharp learning curve” in reference to a skill that is difficult to master. For example, when referring to the difficulty of learning a complex surgical procedure (endoscopic pituitary surgery), one author team contended that it “requires a steep learning curve” (Koc et al., 2006, p. 299). Nevertheless, from the standpoint of learning theory, these and other authors have it backward, because a steep learning curve, i.e., a curve with a large positive slope, is associated with a skill that is acquired easily and rapidly (Hopper et al., 2007).&quot;<p>Curve does not mean &quot;slope&quot;. I feel like it&#x27;s the &quot;learning theory&quot; folks that aught to change their terminology for this one.
评论 #16094715 未加载
评论 #16094840 未加载
评论 #16094663 未加载
评论 #16095052 未加载
评论 #16094655 未加载
评论 #16094805 未加载
elil17超过 7 年前
If only every scientific field had a high quality list like this.
评论 #16106527 未加载
golemotron超过 7 年前
It is interesting that the paper starts with a quote from Steven Pinker, who coined the term &#x27;euphemism treadmill&#x27;. When you change language because it is occasionally misused you don&#x27;t solve the problem, you just move it.
评论 #16096631 未加载
jhiska超过 7 年前
All in all, from a certain perspective it&#x27;s a nice list, but keep a critical mind while reading it because the author sometimes seeks to rewrite the terms used to advance his own views on what is valid and what isn&#x27;t.
nickysielicki超过 7 年前
I find it worrying that the buzzfeed template has found its way to ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Granted, they did dedicate an <i>entire</i> paragraph to <i>fifty</i> different complicated topics, but the feeling is the same.
评论 #16094571 未加载
评论 #16095789 未加载
评论 #16094994 未加载