TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

China builds ‘world’s biggest air purifier’ and it seems to be working

118 点作者 cesis超过 7 年前

16 条评论

jhugg超过 7 年前
So... to drop the PM2.5 amount by 15%, this tower must be removing many many tons of particulate matter every day. How is it removed from the filters they speak of? How expensive is that to do? I have some questions about the practicality.<p>On the other hand, I wonder if anyone&#x27;s ever built a 100m placebo before. It could be a <i>really</i> interesting university study on the placebo effect in disguise.
评论 #16159005 未加载
评论 #16158482 未加载
gressquel超过 7 年前
Please refrain from using AMP links. We need to take a stance against Googles abuse of monopoly.
评论 #16158890 未加载
评论 #16158628 未加载
makethetick超过 7 年前
More readable non-mobile link: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.scmp.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;china&#x2F;society&#x2F;article&#x2F;2128355&#x2F;china-builds-worlds-biggest-air-purifier-and-it-seems-be-working" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.scmp.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;china&#x2F;society&#x2F;article&#x2F;2128355&#x2F;china...</a>
SurrealSoul超过 7 年前
I wish there was more than anecdotal evidence for this. China has very strong statistics for their pollution levels that are often recorded in their weather reports.<p>For a project this big, they should be able to quantify the results instead of just relying on what people say about the air :&#x2F;<p>EDIT: I&#x27;m a dummy, although the article leaves with an anecdotal, there are some nuggets of stats &quot;The average reduction in PM2.5 – the fine particles in smog deemed most harmful to health – fell 15 per cent during heavy pollution.&quot; &amp; &quot;Cao said the results were preliminary because the experiment is still ongoing. The team plans to release more detailed data in March with a full scientific assessment of the facility’s overall performance.&quot;
评论 #16159452 未加载
radarsat1超过 7 年前
I really like how simple this solution is. Just using the sun to heat up air and have it go up through a bunch of filters, no moving parts. It strikes me as the right way to go about it. I wonder if you could use the greenhouses for growing plants, and the rising air to run small turbines..
评论 #16158583 未加载
xkcd-sucks超过 7 年前
Such a mainland solution... The air&#x27;s dirty, install an air filter. There&#x27;s lots of air and it&#x27;s really dirty? Build a bigger air filter!<p>...especially if my uncle manufactures air filter membranes and needs to get rid of some extra inventory
quadcore超过 7 年前
Side node: is China doing ok in terms of innovation? If yes, how come in such a regime? I would expect everything to be stuck in bureaucracy.
评论 #16158634 未加载
评论 #16158863 未加载
评论 #16158379 未加载
评论 #16158613 未加载
评论 #16159263 未加载
评论 #16158601 未加载
评论 #16163235 未加载
评论 #16160404 未加载
评论 #16163864 未加载
ChuckMcM超过 7 年前
Seems like a reasonable way to pump air through a filter. It will be interesting to see long term effects and maintenance costs (eventually the filters need to be replaced as efficiency would go down with increased air resistance in the tower).<p>This FastCompany article from 2013 (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fastcompany.com&#x2F;2682151&#x2F;5-imaginative-buildings-that-breathe-pollution-and-clean-the-air" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fastcompany.com&#x2F;2682151&#x2F;5-imaginative-buildings-...</a>) had some additional concepts that could be added.
Kayou超过 7 年前
&gt;Xian can experience heavy pollution in winter, with much of the city’s heating relying on coal.<p>Have they tried to filter directly the air at the source of pollution? For instance, placing filters on the coal heating facilities. It should be more efficient, as you wouldn&#x27;t release as many particles in the air in the first place.
评论 #16158418 未加载
评论 #16158250 未加载
alex_duf超过 7 年前
Edit: as pointed bellow it&#x27;s using filters. Sorry didn&#x27;t see that<p>If I understand correctly this &quot;air purifier&quot; is just shooting polluted air up, bringing cleaner air from above.<p>That sounds like a very short term solution, but it&#x27;s interesting
评论 #16157934 未加载
whoiskevin超过 7 年前
I couldn’t help but think of the book “The Water Knife”. In the book it is the the Chinese that build massive liveable spaces that recycle the water and purify the air. Just a small step in that direction.
评论 #16160271 未加载
jostmey超过 7 年前
I don&#x27;t see Humanity becoming less destructive on the environment, so this represents our future. It would be nice if an outside source could verify its effectiveness
评论 #16159628 未加载
_salmon超过 7 年前
Has it not been completely built? The article features a few pictures of it under construction and then an artist&#x27;s impression of how it would look.
评论 #16158691 未加载
darethas超过 7 年前
This may sound like a naive question, but how does this compare to say, trees?
评论 #16158862 未加载
reacharavindh超过 7 年前
I wish there was some technical background of what such a &quot;purification tower&quot; does. If they found a genuinely innovative way of purifying air and dumping the toxins and by products sensibly, that is mazing for all of us kudos to them! However, if they tried to push the problem away by shooting polluted air away and sucking in fresher air, then it sucks.
评论 #16157952 未加载
golem14超过 7 年前
Maybe also an attempt to test solar updraft power generation ?