TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Old Taxonomy of the Logical Fallacies

33 点作者 onuralp超过 7 年前

3 条评论

YeGoblynQueenne超过 7 年前
To be honest, although this is a good resource, if I see another comment on the internet using the phrase &quot;that&#x27;s a fallacy&quot; or &quot;your argument is false&quot; and other pseudo-logical phrases like that, I&#x27;m going to... to... drink some water to calm down.<p>It&#x27;s just so annoying in the middle of a conversation people suddendly switching to an analysis of the <i>structure</i> of the debate, especially since nine times out of ten they have no idea what they&#x27;re talking about and just use &quot;fallacy&quot; and &quot;argument&quot; as stop-words (words to end debate).
评论 #16247279 未加载
评论 #16250344 未加载
评论 #16246123 未加载
评论 #16246109 未加载
评论 #16246586 未加载
评论 #16246571 未加载
infinity0超过 7 年前
Looks like both the old and the new omit the &quot;fallacy fallacy&quot; which is to assume someone&#x27;s conclusion is false, simply because their argument on why it&#x27;s true was fallacious.
评论 #16245782 未加载
评论 #16245739 未加载
评论 #16245511 未加载
ndr超过 7 年前
For a ctrl-f friendlier version: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fallacyfiles.org&#x2F;taxonnew.htm" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fallacyfiles.org&#x2F;taxonnew.htm</a><p>I&#x27;m not sure whether the old vs new is about presentation or actual content.
评论 #16246040 未加载