TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

iMac Pro 18-core Follow Up Review

109 点作者 ek750超过 7 年前

9 条评论

plg超过 7 年前
A lot of the negative comments wrt cost are versions of this: what a ripoff, you can get better components for way less money in some other PC and&#x2F;or if you build your own.<p>That&#x27;s nice but it&#x27;s not Apple&#x27;s market. Apple&#x27;s market is not other PCs, and it&#x27;s not build your own.<p>This criticism of Apple has been around ever since Apple has been around (1970s). While the criticism has basically stayed the same since then, Apple has not stayed the same, they have grown. Their products have improved. Their market share has grown and it continues to grow.<p>Some people pay more money for a Benz, and other people say Hey that&#x27;s a ripoff, I can buy a Toyota that gets me to work and back, just like your expensive Benz, for half the price! What a ripoff!<p>Apple is not in the business of making inexpensive PCs (and accepting all of the tradeoffs therein). The trends show that more and more people are willing to spend their money on Apple products.<p>They are clearly doing something right.<p>If you are enraged by their success, perhaps you are not their target market. And that is ok.
评论 #16300696 未加载
评论 #16302464 未加载
评论 #16300753 未加载
评论 #16301130 未加载
评论 #16301684 未加载
评论 #16302537 未加载
评论 #16300680 未加载
blt超过 7 年前
Sounds great, but I still have trouble with the idea of a $10,000 machine that is permanently married to one monitor and unexpandable. If I&#x27;m spending that much on a computer I want PCI slots. Especially now that it&#x27;s common to keep a desktop for 5+ years.
评论 #16300918 未加载
评论 #16301062 未加载
评论 #16300615 未加载
saagarjha超过 7 年前
&gt; Though I haven&#x27;t mentioned it, if you look back through the various benchmark results, you&#x27;ll see that the 18-core iMac Pro shows no disadvantage for single-core performance, despite running at a lower clock speed (2.3GHz&#x2F;4.3GHz) than the 10-core iMac Pro (3.0GHz&#x2F;4.5GHz). Often times, the price of scaling a CPU architecture to more cores is a loss of single-core performance, but no such penalty seems to exist here. The 18-core iMac Pro brings 8 more cores to the table on the high end with no loss of performance on the low end.<p>I remember this being an issue on the older Mac Pros; it&#x27;s interesting that this isn&#x27;t an issue anymore. What&#x27;s the reason behind it? Better thermals? Turbo Boost?
评论 #16300370 未加载
NKosmatos超过 7 年前
Would love to see a “real world” benchmark involving Lightroom, Photoshop, Camera raw and Premier. I don’t think the target customer of the iMac pros would run CFD on them ;-)
评论 #16300210 未加载
评论 #16300204 未加载
评论 #16300233 未加载
评论 #16300265 未加载
UncleEntity超过 7 年前
&gt; CFD tends to be a good real-world benchmark...If this was a car test drive, running CFD would be like showing up at the dealership with three tons of gravel on a trailer and hitching it up.<p>Ummm...perhaps the author has a different definition of &quot;real-world&quot; than I do?
评论 #16300373 未加载
评论 #16300389 未加载
et2o超过 7 年前
Is anyone running production computational fluid dynamics simulations on a desktop anyway? Seems like something that would get farmed out on an HPC cluster with a couple hundred cores minimum.
ghostcluster超过 7 年前
It&#x27;s incredibly expensive with a mediocre AMD GPU. No Nvidia option, meaining no CUDA. No TensorFlow.<p>A really weird machine that seems overly strong in some areas and absolutely weak in fundamentally critical places.
评论 #16300834 未加载
jaak超过 7 年前
&gt; My 10-core test unit prices out at $9,599, and a comparable 18-core unit would be $11,199, a 17% increase in cost.<p>All I can say here is &quot;Wow!!!&quot; That&#x27;s an amazing price for a computer that is completely user hostile to upgrade or repair.
评论 #16300798 未加载
评论 #16300673 未加载
评论 #16300660 未加载
评论 #16300664 未加载
评论 #16302011 未加载
cutler超过 7 年前
£4900 for the 8-core iMac Pro. It seems Apple worship has plumbed new depths of lunacy.
评论 #16300646 未加载