TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Probing Planets in Extragalactic Galaxies Using Quasar Microlensing

72 点作者 IntronExon超过 7 年前

4 条评论

zaroth超过 7 年前
My first thought is of the sheer quantity of extraterrestrial organisms which must exist in the incomprehensible vastness our universe.<p>Maybe the laws of physics and mortality will prevent us from meeting them, let proving their existence, but in such an ultimate vastness where we know that life does exist, <i>life must exist</i>.<p>I don’t get Fermi though. If you take the inconceivably large problem space that is “life finding other life in the universe” and cross it with the infinitesimally small amount of space-time we’ve occupied actively looking for other life, how is not having found other life yet a paradox?
评论 #16325254 未加载
评论 #16325454 未加载
评论 #16329264 未加载
评论 #16327401 未加载
评论 #16325512 未加载
评论 #16326829 未加载
dmitrybrant超过 7 年前
Just a nitpick, but wouldn&#x27;t it be simpler to say &quot;extragalactic planets&quot; instead of &quot;planets in extragalactic galaxies&quot;?<p>That&#x27;s like saying &quot;life on extraterrestrial earths.&quot;
评论 #16328034 未加载
mabbo超过 7 年前
&gt; We constrain the planet mass fraction to be larger than 0.0001 of the halo mass, which is equivalent to 2,000 objects ranging from Moon to Jupiter mass per main sequence star.<p>So the paper is saying there there probably aren&#x27;t more than 2000 planets per star? That seems like a pretty large upper-bound.
评论 #16325957 未加载
jxub超过 7 年前
This title sounds amazingly cool for a science paper.