TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Book that is completely opposite of how you think as a software dev?

8 点作者 38932ur98u超过 7 年前
Have you ever read anything that has exposed you to a way of thinking that's just so incredibly different from everything software development/startup related? A kind of new mental model that doesn't even fit the abstraction-based, incredibly analytical mental models that devs usually try to use to explain the world (i.e. “mentals models are a mental model”)? It seems to me like we (and I’m probably projecting here) try to quickly put ideas into a rough abstraction so we can classify them and be done with it. But how about a style of thinking that has no concept of abstraction, or models? Or what’s an abstraction of software dev style thinking? If there is some higher level of abstraction to dev thinking, then what’s another ‘concrete’ style on the same level as that? Just some thoughts…I’d love to hear suggestions on books that were starkly different than how you currently think about the world.

6 条评论

git-pull超过 7 年前
<i>Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry into Values</i> by Robert M. Pirsig<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Zen_and_the_Art_of_Motorcycle_Maintenance" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Zen_and_the_Art_of_Motorcycle_...</a>
bewe42超过 7 年前
&quot;Why greatness cannot be planned&quot;. Changed the way I search for new ideas. Instead of goal setting and conquer-and-divide approach, I allow myself to be guided by what I find interesting, even if it seems to be wasting time. In the book, the author calls that &quot;finding stepping stones&quot;. I always felt that this is a better way to create new things but was unable to put it into words.<p>There&#x27;s also a talk: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=dXQPL9Gooy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=dXQPL9Gooy</a>
saltvedt超过 7 年前
Not that I&#x27;ve actually read the book myself, but Being and Time by Heidegger seems to fit your description.<p>Reading it will feel like running into a brick wall, so I suggest reading about Heidegger for context first: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;plato.stanford.edu&#x2F;entries&#x2F;heidegger&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;plato.stanford.edu&#x2F;entries&#x2F;heidegger&#x2F;</a><p>Reading the article above might still feel like running into a wall though (perhaps one of wood, this time). You might want to have a listen to an episode on Heidegger by Philosophize This!: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;philosophizethis.org&#x2F;episode-100-transcript&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;philosophizethis.org&#x2F;episode-100-transcript&#x2F;</a>
quickthrower2超过 7 年前
The Alchemist by Paulo Coelho, although admittedly I never finished it, I can&#x27;t remember why. I really want to pick it up again.
jxub超过 7 年前
<i>Conan the Barbarian</i> comes to mind.<p>A tale of magick, poetry and raw killer instinct in a godforsaken universe.
some_account超过 7 年前
It&#x27;s lonely outside the box :) No but seriously, you bring up interesting ideas.