TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Magic Leap One Video – Diffractive Waveguides Confirmed

174 点作者 IntronExon超过 7 年前

11 条评论

dmix超过 7 年前
Very interesting insight from a former GPU developer at Magic Leap:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;hIXTQ#e6Vdo3B" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;hIXTQ#e6Vdo3B</a><p>He believes they should have focused on making the headset and gone with integrating with a mobile device instead of an integrated SoC...That said there&#x27;s usually a reason (low-level) engineers are engineers and not product people... but he makes some good points.<p>The one I most disagree with is &quot;why develop Apps with ML when you could develop apps on Apple (iOS)&quot;<p>Well one good reason is that a) game developers and VR&#x2F;AR devs aren&#x27;t necessarily developing on iOS already yet and b) it&#x27;s an entirely new (potentially large) new market where you could become a top developer more easily. And they&#x27;d still have to build a significant part of their SDK on top of iOS or Android, no?
评论 #16382868 未加载
评论 #16385303 未加载
评论 #16383846 未加载
评论 #16385419 未加载
评论 #16383447 未加载
评论 #16383849 未加载
olympus超过 7 年前
There seems to be several people with a tech hardware background that doubt that Magic Leap can deliver on their promises. But somehow they have no problem raising money or getting publicity. Either they have something that is real and <i>extremely</i> convincing to investors that they have been able to keep very secret, or they have a really slick slide deck made of lies.<p>We’ll know for sure if&#x2F;when the first production devices go on sale, but if Shaq was wearing a real pair then I don’t want them.
评论 #16381663 未加载
评论 #16381577 未加载
评论 #16383026 未加载
评论 #16381433 未加载
评论 #16381368 未加载
评论 #16383117 未加载
throwaway145679超过 7 年前
These guys were definitely going to be using diffractive waveguides (photonic crystal waveguides). Look at the LinkedIn profiles of some of the folks on their optical design team (especially the ones with titles that include &quot;Diffractive Optics Engineer&quot;). One had a PhD adviser at Berkeley (Eli Yablanovitch) who originally coined the term &quot;photonic crystal&quot;, another wrote a widely used open source implementation of RCWA (S4) while working with a top group in photonic crystal design at Stanford (Shanhui Fan), and some of their engineering leadership came to the company from what was Digital Optics Corporation.
评论 #16381227 未加载
DaveSapien超过 7 年前
I Think its also quite telling that they found the biggest person they could find (Shaquille) to do the physical showcase. On an average sized person these will be massive, and not just look(and feel) like large weird sunglasses. And no, I dont believe that these where the &quot;large&quot; version, except in the regard of the headband. I doubt the core unit will be meaningfully smaller.<p>Where in comparison, the HoloLens team seemed to take more care in the design of a large device on a person&#x27;s head. Looking strange but functional.
评论 #16384434 未加载
kbenson超过 7 年前
I&#x27;m still waiting for more info on Near Eye Light Field devices.[1][2]<p>Actually, it appears there&#x27;s more on this now[3][4], but the video&#x27;s audio is a weird translation of some paper or something.<p>1: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;research.nvidia.com&#x2F;publication&#x2F;near-eye-light-field-displays" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;research.nvidia.com&#x2F;publication&#x2F;near-eye-light-field...</a><p>2: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=uwCwtBxZM7g" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=uwCwtBxZM7g</a><p>3: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;research.nvidia.com&#x2F;publication&#x2F;2017-11_%09Near-eye-Light-Field" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;research.nvidia.com&#x2F;publication&#x2F;2017-11_%09Near-eye-L...</a><p>4: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=NdTycenXID8" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=NdTycenXID8</a>
评论 #16382620 未加载
deelowe超过 7 年前
That was painful to read and the comments are even worse. I&#x27;m not sure I trust anything stated in this write-up.
评论 #16381535 未加载
评论 #16381053 未加载
评论 #16381016 未加载
mrarjen超过 7 年前
Getting this whole &quot;silicon valley tv show&quot; vibe here, where it&#x27;s the VR company that gets to much hype. Almost seems like they are too deep in and need to keep going hoping it will be accepted in the market.<p>Still think AR has a lot more potential than VR in the long run. Just need to get that &quot;Yes!&quot; moment where the technology has a perfect fit and use for it.
评论 #16383212 未加载
评论 #16382884 未加载
jxramos超过 7 年前
&quot;&quot;&quot;The rest of the video made my ears bleed. It was the usual Rony doing his hype and buzzword salad trying to fit in as much hype in as he could without really saying anything.&quot;&quot;&quot;<p><i>Hype and buzzword salad</i>, I&#x27;m going to be taking that one with me into the future.
评论 #16383071 未加载
russdill超过 7 年前
It seems like the way they made things appear to have substance in AR then is to drop down visual light to 15%.
评论 #16383904 未加载
colordrops超过 7 年前
What does &quot;more VR than AR&quot; even mean? Either the user is seeing virtual objects overlaid on the real world or not. It has nothing to do with the opacity of the lenses.
评论 #16381833 未加载
评论 #16381825 未加载
评论 #16383231 未加载
paul7986超过 7 年前
AR Glasses are going to be as big as the Apple Watch.....
评论 #16382522 未加载
评论 #16385121 未加载