TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Thoughts on the universal Linux packages called “snaps”?

2 点作者 _noqo超过 7 年前
I noted that Ubuntu&#x2F;Canonical is pushing Snaps recently but don&#x27;t hear much discussion about it, I see it as an &quot;Electron for Linux distributions&quot; (not necessarily in a bad way), sounds good for the Linux ecosystem!<p>How about performance?, anyone have experience working with this as a developer? (I&#x27;m a designer), share your thoughts!<p>I recently installed the Spotify Snap [1] on Ubuntu and was really easy and works flawlessly.<p>Snaps Wikipedia entry: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Snappy_(package_manager)<p>Snaps website: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;snapcraft.io&#x2F;<p>[1] https:&#x2F;&#x2F;community.spotify.com&#x2F;t5&#x2F;Desktop-Linux&#x2F;Spotify-now-has-a-Snap-package-as-well&#x2F;td-p&#x2F;4220931

1 comment

mariuolo超过 7 年前
There&#x27;s also Flatpak on openSUSE (inter alia).<p>Personally, I&#x27;m torn. This will introduce the possibility for developers to distribute self-contained applications like dmg on OSX, but it will also create potential security problems.<p>Since the code won&#x27;t be vetted by the distro maintainers, each &quot;blobbing&quot; system will have to ensure proper sandboxing and it will be up to authors&#x2F;distributors that included libraries are kept up to date with regard to vulnerabilities.<p>On the other hand, many less expert users will be able to simply download and use their favourite program without much fuss. Moreover, applications that can&#x27;t be built on OSes on account of library versions will simply carry their dependencies around.