TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

U.S. considers adding nuclear cruise missiles to destroyers and submarines

35 点作者 IntronExon大约 7 年前

8 条评论

maxander大约 7 年前
One wonders what these people are thinking, when the very suggestion of having these weapons available to use puts the whole planet incrementally nearer to nuclear catastrophe. The cost-benefit analysis is so painfully slanted against <i>anything like this</i> that it&#x27;s absolutely absurd- we have the nuclear triad already, for what it&#x27;s worth, and it can do it&#x27;s job better than we need. These toys have no well-defined safe use case and risks that the human mind can scarcely comprehend.<p>Is this part of some diplomatic tit-for-tat against the Russians over the attack in Syria last week? That&#x27;s the most reasonable explanation that occurs to me, which is saying something.
评论 #16473533 未加载
评论 #16472211 未加载
评论 #16472793 未加载
jedc大约 7 年前
Speaking as a former Navy submariner, this isn&#x27;t going to happen. The surface Navy doesn&#x27;t have the background or training to handle nuclear weapons - nukes are (and should be) taken extraordinarily seriously. They&#x27;re not just an add-on weapon, they simply have to be the core of what that ship does in order to be treated properly.
评论 #16471566 未加载
评论 #16471497 未加载
评论 #16471209 未加载
评论 #16471591 未加载
评论 #16471174 未加载
评论 #16471317 未加载
评论 #16471125 未加载
评论 #16471178 未加载
notatoad大约 7 年前
Are these the same destroyers that drove into merchant ships twice last summer?
njarboe大约 7 年前
The world would be much better off if the only nuclear weapons were ICBMs based in the heart of the country that would be launching them. There would be no ambiguity on who has attacked when everyone can see where the missile came from.<p>Does the US really need a nuclear cruise missile now that they are not needed to destroy Soviet tank battalions invading Europe? Nuclear powers ought to try really hard not to be shooting at each other and have clear Schelling points not to cross so that nuclear exchange does not happen by a series of small scale escalations. More people who can launch nuclear weapons is a bad idea.
评论 #16472855 未加载
tritium大约 7 年前
In a shooting war, you wouldn’t want a large conventional rocket attack or zodiac-delivered explosion, to disable the controls for scuttling the ship, and disrupt the chain of command for orders to scuttle due enemy action killing key crew members. The fog of war could lead to enough confusion and damage, such that a seaworthy ship is left afloat with no leadership, in dangerous waters.<p>Military ships can be difficult to sink, and willfully sinking them might not always be an option. So if the ship is captured, and held long enough to put warheads in the hands of a dangerous people, the weapons could disappear and appear in the hands of someone looking to extract a ransom to return them unused.<p>With submarines, this is not the case, even if the bottom of the ocean isn’t always unreachable. At least the bottom of the ocean sufficiently complicates salvage, past a certain depth.
SN76477大约 7 年前
No one wants another arms race.
评论 #16471666 未加载
评论 #16472845 未加载
000000000000001大约 7 年前
Chutiyapanti ki bhi hadd hoti hai
Feniks大约 7 年前
I thought we had agreed that tactical nuclear weapons are an evolutionary dead end? Are nuclear options on the table again?
评论 #16476152 未加载