TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

U.S. Has Been Watching Russia's Nuclear-Powered Cruise Missiles Crash and Burn

44 点作者 IntronExon大约 7 年前

11 条评论

obblekk大约 7 年前
Does anyone else get a sense of de ja vu from the news this week?<p>- Nuclear weapons development, specifically targeted at the US<p>- Trade Tariffs<p>- Improper security classification in the whitehouse<p>- Israel, Iran threatening war<p>- China becomes a dictatorship<p>Feels like we&#x27;re going backward in time for some reason.
评论 #16510146 未加载
roywiggins大约 7 年前
And that&#x27;s why we didn&#x27;t test one ourselves back in the 60s. You need a special kind of attitude to be willing to fly one of these things over your own country.<p>Or perhaps just ready access to barely-populated Arctic regions where nobody&#x27;s watching you drop nuclear reactors around.<p>These things are the most over-the-top method of beating missile defenses. A normal response would be to just deploy more missiles, which are cheaper and faster to build than defense, so it&#x27;s easy to keep up. But no, apparently they went in this direction.
评论 #16510110 未加载
评论 #16510054 未加载
评论 #16510034 未加载
评论 #16510185 未加载
gaius大约 7 年前
The joke&#x27;s on Russia. American anti-missile defences couldn&#x27;t stop their old missiles anyway!
评论 #16510133 未加载
评论 #16510193 未加载
wcarss大约 7 年前
I&#x27;m glad that this story notes the elevated isotope detection levels last year and the possibility that the US detection plane sent up around that time may have been doing some classified investigation of evidence of an engine of this sort. The article sadly (I mean, of course, but still sadly) has nothing conclusive or very new to say on that topic, but it&#x27;s still interesting to see others are also curious about whether there&#x27;s a link.<p>Makes me wonder also, though probably a lot less likely of a link, about the other story run by thedrive recently of the released FAA and ATC conversation regarding the unknown, fast moving, large white airplane-like craft that wandered up the west coast late last year.<p>I&#x27;m not sure if an infinite range nuclear-reactor-containing &quot;cruise missile&quot;&#x27;s visible characteristics would necessarily be &quot;missile-like&quot;, i.e. a cigar with small fins, or if it could reasonably at that point just be... an airplane. It would be ballsy as hell for a Russian experimental nuclear-missile-plane to fly deep deep into American airspace in a common corridor with civilian commercial airliners, like, that would seem to be way too far into an insane possibility that would demand a war-like response, and it&#x27;s far likelier to have been a US craft from a base in the region, but... it would really be the <i>ultimate</i> test of the system&#x27;s penetrative and evasive capabilities, if it were such a thing.<p>What do other folks think?
评论 #16510354 未加载
评论 #16510495 未加载
n1000大约 7 年前
Anyone knows of some reading material on how such an engine could technically work? I wonder how a nuclear reactor could create propulsion.
评论 #16510401 未加载
评论 #16510438 未加载
评论 #16510371 未加载
评论 #16510426 未加载
clon大约 7 年前
&gt; At the most basic conceptual level, the weapon could conceivably reach supersonic speeds, fly at very low altitudes, and have effectively unlimited range thanks to its nuclear powerplant<p>If the Ruskies have developed a reactionless rocket engine capable of crashing further down range than experimental error, I would keep silent as well &#x2F;s
评论 #16510019 未加载
评论 #16510080 未加载
exabrial大约 7 年前
The good news is, no one wants a nuclear war anymore... at least I hope.<p>I think what changed is largely trade. China, usually the USA&#x27;s enemy, has benefited enormously by trading with the USA and providing a cheap labor pool for manufacturing after Unions made it too expensive to continue manual manufacturing in the United States.<p>So if my theory is true, it&#x27;s probably worth allowing vestment in our fellow nuclear superpowers. Seems backwards, but most things in economics and game theory are.
评论 #16510327 未加载
评论 #16511448 未加载
评论 #16510367 未加载
评论 #16510336 未加载
desireco42大约 7 年前
Usually when you are testing things, they will fail a lot. Like SpaceX, a lot of boosters crashed, that doesn&#x27;t mean it is less awesome what they developed and it worked in the end once they got kinks out.<p>This is weird article.
exabrial大约 7 年前
I&#x27;m curious if the orbital infrared detection satellites we have would see this object. Seems like the theory of operation means it has to be ridiculously hot to work.
golergka大约 7 年前
Why would US bother? All the news about new Russian missiles were mostly for interior propaganda consumption anyway.
thegreatcosmo大约 7 年前
Maybe but either way the era of USA unilaterally pushing wars just ended. Russia with their hypersonic nukes and proxy wars wins have just made western imperialism via war and culture have very high costs.
评论 #16510223 未加载
评论 #16510122 未加载
评论 #16510424 未加载