TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

TunSafe: A High Performance WireGuard Client for Windows

9 点作者 ludde大约 7 年前

4 条评论

zx2c4大约 7 年前
As the author of WireGuard, I&#x27;d <i>STRONGLY</i> advise against using this closed-source implementation, which likely has interoperability and security issues.<p>We&#x27;ll have an official Windows client coming out shortly, which won&#x27;t have these same security concerns.
评论 #16515693 未加载
pepe56大约 7 年前
Hey ludde, I highly appreciate your work. Especially because there are no real alternative clients at the moment for Windows. Also from knowing the first utorrent versions (not the crap from nowadays) I believe you are able to produce efficient code. However I would agree, that the spirit of Wireguard is to encourage to keep code simple and auditable. That&#x27;s what Jason highlights in his motivation. Having a closed source implementation on top of that feels a bit wrong and I find it hard to support this.<p>Why not go the hybrid approach and make it open source so people can understand and audit it. You could still ask for donations or even provide a compiled version for some dollars like <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.blink.sh&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.blink.sh&#x2F;</a>
评论 #16573538 未加载
nostream大约 7 年前
Cool news!<p>zx2c4: Would it be possible for you to configure the WireGuard demo server so that it detects if there are interoperability issues with other clients?
评论 #16516495 未加载
fulafel大约 7 年前
Is it implemented in a memory safe language?
评论 #16516487 未加载
评论 #16515774 未加载