TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Debian 9.4 released

226 点作者 merraksh大约 7 年前

12 条评论

hyper_reality大约 7 年前
The fact that the vast majority of these bugfixes and CVEs are minor is a testament to the continuing stability and quality of Debian and its ecosystem. I've run Debian on several machines for years and have upgraded confidently without a hitch. A big thank you to the maintainers and developers for making this possible.
评论 #16558797 未加载
评论 #16559983 未加载
评论 #16559047 未加载
teddyh大约 7 年前
Please note: Starting with Debian 7, the minor number is not part of the Debian release number, and numbers with a minor component like 8.7 or 9.4 now indicate a <i>point</i> release. Basically, only security updates and major bug fixes, with new updated installation media images. This, 9.4, is <i>not</i> a new major release of Debian.
mariusmg大约 7 年前
Thumbs up for Debian, the workhorse of the entire Linux ecosystem.
ausjke大约 7 年前
Debian for server, definitely.<p>Ubuntu for desktop, which is similar to Debian.<p>Openwrt for devices that has limited RAM.<p>FreeRTOS for MCUs with real-time needs.<p>That covers the universe for me, enjoy them all.
评论 #16558750 未加载
评论 #16558837 未加载
评论 #16558816 未加载
评论 #16559153 未加载
jordigh大约 7 年前
Can someone explain this to me? I&#x27;ve had an issue with Postgres on Debian stable because Postgres had to address a CVE which changed its dump format in a backwards-incompatible way. This meant that my local Debian on my laptop couldn&#x27;t load a dump I created on a patched Ubuntu server. Postgres 9.6.8 is the one that fixes this CVE in the 9.6 series.<p>This says the stable package is still vulnerable:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;security-tracker.debian.org&#x2F;tracker&#x2F;CVE-2018-1058" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;security-tracker.debian.org&#x2F;tracker&#x2F;CVE-2018-1058</a><p>But Postgres doesn&#x27;t show up here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;security-tracker.debian.org&#x2F;tracker&#x2F;status&#x2F;release&#x2F;stable" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;security-tracker.debian.org&#x2F;tracker&#x2F;status&#x2F;release&#x2F;s...</a><p>The 9.6.8 version indeed isn&#x27;t on stable yet. So is the latter link just buggy? Or is Postgres getting filtered out?<p>Edit: Never mind, after messing with the filter (guess there&#x27;s no Debian Security Advisory for this CVE), I was able to get Postgres in the second link:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;security-tracker.debian.org&#x2F;tracker&#x2F;status&#x2F;release&#x2F;stable?filter=1&amp;filter=unassigned_urgency&amp;filter=nodsa" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;security-tracker.debian.org&#x2F;tracker&#x2F;status&#x2F;release&#x2F;s...</a>
评论 #16560008 未加载
ergo14大约 7 年前
How is debian nowdays for setting up things like containers? I&#x27;ve tried lxc in the past few years ago and got it working but it was not a pleasant experience, templates were broken.<p>I would love them to gain back more server marketshare.
评论 #16558571 未加载
评论 #16558687 未加载
评论 #16558775 未加载
评论 #16558859 未加载
评论 #16558611 未加载
评论 #16558608 未加载
passthejoe大约 7 年前
Depending on your use case, Debian Stable can be a great thing. If it worked great on a given computer (i.e. everything works), and I was just writing or using programs that were themselves fairly &quot;stable,&quot; then it will work.<p>If you&#x27;re a developer and don&#x27;t mind older packages, or if you install and manage your dev tools from outside the distribution, it can also work for you. This is a lot of people.<p>But if you rely on your distribution to provide reasonably up-to-date packages (and for better or worse, that&#x27;s me right now), then Debian Stable might not be the right choice. When I do development in Linux, I tend to be more comfortable in Fedora, which is much more aggressive when it comes to updating packages during the life of a release. I&#x27;m not crazy about major upgrades every 6 months, though you can do it once a year if you wish.<p>For better or worse, I think that Ubuntu + PPAs is the path of least resistance -- if you trust the maintainers of your PPAs, that is.
notyourday大约 7 年前
Frankly, I do not understand the fawning over Debian. It became the same kind of &quot;try to be everything and do nothing well&quot; distribution Slackware was.<p>Up until 8 it was still good for servers but 8 brought systemd, which <i>maybe</i> has a place on a Desktop, but is definitely not anything useful for servers. Ok, so lets pretend it is a desktop. Oh wait, it is a desktop that does not contain the lastest video drivers? It is a desktop that does not contain seamless switch between free nvidia and proprietary nvidia?
facorreia大约 7 年前
I&#x27;m a bit surprised that the Docker image is not released as part of the same release process.<p>They seem to be released by a separate project &#x2F; org called &quot;debuerreotype&quot;[1].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;debuerreotype&#x2F;debuerreotype" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;debuerreotype&#x2F;debuerreotype</a>
keithpeter大约 7 年前
Debian servers and mirrors still showing 9.3 (UK, 17:45 Saturday 10th March)<p>I just downloaded v9.3 DVD1&#x2F;2 to make an offline installation.<p>Anyone know where the 9.4 upgrade iso is?
squarefoot大约 7 年前
Obligatory reference to the list of platforms Debian has been ported to and the &quot;blends&quot; it can be customized to. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.debian.org&#x2F;ports&#x2F;index.en.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.debian.org&#x2F;ports&#x2F;index.en.html</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.debian.org&#x2F;blends&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.debian.org&#x2F;blends&#x2F;</a><p>BTW, many moons ago I used Red Hat on Alphas, so I know it&#x27;s not the only one. Still it&#x27;s impressive.
fosco大约 7 年前
I realize the decision is said and done but can anyone share in easy to understand terms what the big deal is with systemd?
评论 #16558779 未加载
评论 #16559537 未加载