My web company <a href="http://www.campusassassins.com">http://www.campusassassins.com</a> was recently featured in the USA Today, but the article is what you might call 'negative.' It warns people not to engage in the activity that my website organizes. Do you think that negative PR is still good?<p>Here's the article<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2007-04-24-student-assassin-game_N.htm">http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2007-04-24-student-assassin-game_N.htm</a>
I wouldn't exactly call that negative PR. They didn't blame you, or come out and call you a monster. It was more of a casual reference. If my company was featured that way in a large publication I'd be fairly happy.<p>As a side note, nice idea for a site. Every game I've been involved in was run by hand. I'm not sure I'd be willing to pay $2 a person to organize it though. Have you considered having an 'unlimited' account or the like for $100 or so?