TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

China to bar people with bad 'social credit' from planes, trains

827 点作者 samaysharma大约 7 年前

68 条评论

eddieplan9大约 7 年前
I am deeply disgusted by false equivalency used in many posts this thread. Whatever you think the West is doing <i>is not even close</i> to this. The Chinese government owns and runs more than 50% of the economy and 100% of the industries they deem essential. They can not only cut your off completely from planes and trains, but also your electricity, driver license, internet, telephone, banks, ability to get any travel document, ability to stay at any hotel, etc. Let that sink for a bit, before you claim that Google or even NSA can do something similar.<p>I am a Chinese expat, but I don&#x27;t have a National ID. I have a Chinese passport, but I cannot even buy train tickets online (yet i can ride the train) with it and I cannot open a bank account in my own country. Things will get worse with &#x27;social credit&#x27; as another barrier because I won&#x27;t have a credit history with them.<p>[edit] removed claim that Chinese expat won&#x27;t be able to fly in China without National ID because some say the viral news is a rumor. Honestly i cannot tell any more.
评论 #16603775 未加载
评论 #16604074 未加载
评论 #16605772 未加载
评论 #16604615 未加载
评论 #16604009 未加载
评论 #16604810 未加载
评论 #16605708 未加载
评论 #16604169 未加载
评论 #16604332 未加载
评论 #16603901 未加载
评论 #16603903 未加载
评论 #16603948 未加载
评论 #16603632 未加载
评论 #16606018 未加载
评论 #16605709 未加载
评论 #16606990 未加载
评论 #16606554 未加载
评论 #16615977 未加载
评论 #16603689 未加载
评论 #16604018 未加载
评论 #16603849 未加载
评论 #16605376 未加载
评论 #16603663 未加载
awakeasleep大约 7 年前
To me the principle of “once untrustworthy, always restricted” sounds like the beginning of a new caste system.<p>Everyone&#x27;s children are going to make mistakes. The wealthy are going to be able to cover up their children&#x27;s mistakes, the poor are going to be put on &#x27;the list&#x27; and become &#x27;restricted.&#x27;<p>The restrictions will grow, and eventually you&#x27;ll have a new group of &#x27;untouchables&#x27;
评论 #16602779 未加载
评论 #16602828 未加载
评论 #16602744 未加载
评论 #16602437 未加载
评论 #16602638 未加载
评论 #16603213 未加载
评论 #16603041 未加载
评论 #16602559 未加载
评论 #16602645 未加载
评论 #16604714 未加载
评论 #16603067 未加载
评论 #16602903 未加载
评论 #16603060 未加载
评论 #16603310 未加载
评论 #16603235 未加载
评论 #16602928 未加载
评论 #16602413 未加载
评论 #16604358 未加载
评论 #16603027 未加载
评论 #16602648 未加载
评论 #16603876 未加载
评论 #16602748 未加载
评论 #16602746 未加载
评论 #16602426 未加载
评论 #16602635 未加载
评论 #16602527 未加载
walterbell大约 7 年前
From <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.collective-evolution.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;10&#x2F;26&#x2F;black-mirror-meets-reality-china-moves-to-rate-its-citizens-using-a-social-credit-system&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.collective-evolution.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;10&#x2F;26&#x2F;black-mirror-...</a><p><i>&quot;You won’t be eligible for … positions in public office … social security and welfare … senior level positions in the food and drug sector … sleep in a bed in overnight trains … higher-starred hotels and restaurants … Your children … won’t be allowed to attend more expensive private schools …<p>We have made extreme advancements in health care because people found flaws in previous practices and had faith that they could improve them. This can be applied to quite literally every single industry, which is why these ranking systems could negatively affect growth, innovation, and our entire economic system as a whole.<p>If we can no longer challenge our current state of being and question our surroundings, then how can we continue to advance as a collective? As a collective, many of our strengths lie in our differences. A diverse society includes people with all different strengths and brackets of knowledge, but if we’re all racing to get a better ranking, then we could lose a lot of those differences in trying to become “people pleasers” and adhering to social norms.&quot;</i>
评论 #16602421 未加载
pm90大约 7 年前
The thing that worries me most about the autocracy in China is that all of these Orwellian measures would actually work and then would be pointed out as an example to abandon our civil liberties in favor of a system that may be big brotherly but at least &quot;your kids will always be safe, never be close to any bad person&quot; (By We I&#x27;m referring to Democracies).<p>It may also be a uniquely Chinese thing too though. China has had very powerful Central States for an extremely long time (not just the CPC but all the emperors and what have you). Perhaps that&#x27;s just the &quot;Chinese Way&quot;: absolutist State which largely works for most of the people?
评论 #16602536 未加载
评论 #16602750 未加载
评论 #16603011 未加载
评论 #16602666 未加载
评论 #16602503 未加载
评论 #16603856 未加载
评论 #16602499 未加载
RubenSandwich大约 7 年前
If anyone wants to see some of the negative effects of a persistent &#x27;social score&#x27; that affects real life I recommend this Black Mirror episode: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Nosedive" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Nosedive</a>.
评论 #16602494 未加载
评论 #16602394 未加载
评论 #16602575 未加载
评论 #16602836 未加载
评论 #16606056 未加载
评论 #16602622 未加载
评论 #16602651 未加载
dev_throw大约 7 年前
This illustrates the difference between having laws and enforcing them. Some countries have strict laws, but little enforcement, so marginalized people can break these laws as long as they fly under the radar. With technology, it becomes trivial to implement enforcement for even draconic laws at a scale previously unfathomable. Also, they seem to be rolling it out slowly. It reminds of the metaphorical boiling frog syndome[1], where the frog realizes what predicament it is in, but too late.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Boiling_frog" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Boiling_frog</a>
评论 #16602814 未加载
评论 #16603590 未加载
评论 #16603408 未加载
echevil大约 7 年前
If the author of this article has read the original announcement from either Chinese government or various sources from China, they&#x27;ll know the so called &quot;people with bad social credit&quot; that&#x27;ll get these restrictions is defined very clearly, and yet it mentioned only a tiny bit of it in very misleading way. Many of the actions described in the definition would put you in jail in US. Whether they&#x27;re intentionally misleading people is anybody&#x27;s guess.<p>There are many paragraphs clarifying the definition either here: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ndrc.gov.cn&#x2F;gzdt&#x2F;201803&#x2F;t20180316_879653.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ndrc.gov.cn&#x2F;gzdt&#x2F;201803&#x2F;t20180316_879653.html</a><p>Or here: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ce.cn&#x2F;xwzx&#x2F;gnsz&#x2F;gdxw&#x2F;201803&#x2F;16&#x2F;t20180316_28505546.shtml" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ce.cn&#x2F;xwzx&#x2F;gnsz&#x2F;gdxw&#x2F;201803&#x2F;16&#x2F;t20180316_28505546...</a><p>There is also clearly defined way to lift the restrictions as defined in the NDRC announcement. Most of the restrictions are removed automatically in one year. Certainly not &quot;once untrustworthy, always restricted&quot;
评论 #16605102 未加载
stuffedBelly大约 7 年前
I am Chinese and I can see how this can be exploited by both vigilente groups and the government to target individuals using the &quot;spreading false information&quot; clause alone. There are so many ways to trick people into spreading false information. More importantly, people are not the one to decide what is considered &quot;false&quot;, the government is.<p>It might be ok to make people with bad credit harder to purchase non life-essential stuff such as cars (you heard it, cars are not essentials in many countries), but they shouldn&#x27;t be treated as criminals.
评论 #16603691 未加载
johan_larson大约 7 年前
To be fair we ban people with felony convictions from huge swathes of jobs, formally or informally, even if the crime happened decades ago. Also, good luck finding a place to live legally if you&#x27;ve been convicted of a sex crime.
评论 #16602721 未加载
评论 #16602563 未加载
评论 #16603189 未加载
seibelj大约 7 年前
Truly a dystopia. I hope someday citizens rebel against this nightmare
评论 #16602534 未加载
评论 #16602327 未加载
sytelus大约 7 年前
<i>...committed acts like spreading false information about terrorism and causing trouble on flights, as well as those who used expired tickets or smoked on trains.<p>The move is in line with President’s Xi Jinping’s plan to construct a social credit system based on the principle of “once untrustworthy, always restricted”.<p>6.15 million Chinese citizens had been banned from taking flights for social misdeeds.</i>
phil248大约 7 年前
&quot;China said it will begin applying its so-called social credit ... and stop people who have committed misdeeds from taking such transport for up to a year.&quot;<p>Here in the US, you can get banned from air travel permanently, and you don&#x27;t even need to do anything wrong!
jancsika大约 7 年前
If someone were given dark money and tasked with destabilizing the Chinese govt, I can easily seem them doing the following:<p>* taking half the funds and putting it into think tanks that write pro social credit pieces with an earnest focus on making it more accurate and efficient from a technical standpoint (plus perhaps lobbying for its implementation in the West, for street cred)<p>* taking the other half and putting it towards anti-govt movements within China, using the info gleaned from the think tanks to provide counter-surveillance techniques<p>The counter-surveillance techniques will cause the govt to invest in more surveillance tech and clamp down tighter on the population. That enforcement will further fuel the anti-govt groups to become more radicalized.<p>Of course, I&#x27;m just armchair quarterbacking this based on vaguely remembering the news around the buildup and aftermath of the Iraq war. I&#x27;m sure the Chinese government has thought through these problems more deeply than I have.<p>edit: grammar
avcdsuia大约 7 年前
Shenzhen gov are using facial recognition to detect pedestrians running through the red light[0]. Their even release high quality pictures without mosaic in the first version, just a few days ago.<p>[0]<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.stc.gov.cn&#x2F;facei&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.stc.gov.cn&#x2F;facei&#x2F;</a>
评论 #16604459 未加载
评论 #16604033 未加载
pasbesoin大约 7 年前
Remember, with the Great Firewall: &quot;China is the prototype.&quot; (My words, back when.)<p>They started off purchasing and as an initial market as well as testing ground for Western technology and Western technology companies.<p>Now, China has gained the technology and sophistication to roll their own.<p>But that doesn&#x27;t mean they won&#x27;t market it, both commercially and to aid their allies in creating and maintaining similar forms of governance and stability (at the tip of an connection, if not a gun).<p>So, they may be building this domestically, from the ground up. Nonetheless, the expression remains and remains apt, and concerning: &quot;China is the prototype.&quot;<p>Many people around the world, in government and in private business, continue to express enormous interest in this type of monitoring and control.<p>In the U.K., of all places, that &quot;bastion of democracy&quot;, leadership is openly advocating for the ability to monitor and censure all connections.<p>They are going to control with whom you communicate and associate, by way of real world penalties and controls.<p>In the U.S., what greater limit on &quot;freedom to associate&quot; than taking away one&#x27;s ability to travel?<p>&quot;It can&#x27;t, won&#x27;t happen here.&quot;<p>Ahuh. Just like outsourcing was going to elevate our employment prospects and wages. &quot;We&#x27;ll be the managers.&quot;<p>How did that work out?<p>Automation is going to get a lot more done with less hands. How do you think they are going to decide who benefits?
pishpash大约 7 年前
1. Yes, Chinese society values different things from Western societies on average, but there is a wide range of values in each society and a great deal of overlap with universal expectations, so don&#x27;t brush it aside as a difference in culture or political desires.<p>2. This is going way beyond tradition or culture. Nobody enjoys this.<p>3. It is being pushed through for the very simple fact that it can be pushed through. Take note: politics is groups of people trying to gain advantage over others and an equilibrium requires a vigorous defense of the smallest things that are yours; without pushback you lose what&#x27;s yours; nobody will grant to you, only take away.<p>4. Norms and ideals matter. This is being set as the norm in China, whereas other examples in Western countries are at least considered transgressions against the norm. The delineations are in different places and the outcomes will absolutely not be the same even if they look superficially similar.
jsonne大约 7 年前
China is doing this explicitly, but the West has been doing this implicitly for a while. Doxxing people with the &quot;wrong&quot; opinion and emailing their employers, friends, etc. I pretty regularly see if on Facebook where someone says something and their post or a screenshot of their post is shared hundreds of thousands of times with test that says &quot;make this person famous&quot;. To be clear people should be called out for bigoted speech. An internet lynch mob though solves nothing and just creates a forever alienated group of people outside of society with little to no stake in the future. We all, as in humanity, could use understanding the nuance of stopping bad behavior while also forgiving people for their pasts. I don&#x27;t have all the answers, but I guess I wrote this as it&#x27;s just a generally worrying trend I see with the internet overall.
评论 #16602398 未加载
评论 #16602518 未加载
评论 #16602374 未加载
评论 #16602665 未加载
评论 #16602479 未加载
评论 #16602432 未加载
评论 #16602525 未加载
评论 #16602469 未加载
Pmop大约 7 年前
Bear in mind that discussions about Chinese matters may be rigged by the 50 cent army. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;50_Cent_Party" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;50_Cent_Party</a>
jrs95大约 7 年前
The good news about this social credit system is that China&#x27;s self driving cars will be able to make more optimal decisions about who lives and dies when a crash is inevitable. Isn&#x27;t innovation wonderful!?
Dove大约 7 年前
China has been working on this for a while, and barring people from transportation is not the scary bit. That&#x27;s last-century scary. No, it&#x27;s the emergence of a new sort of ideological warfare making use of the recent knowledge developed in gaming industry that is the scary bit. This is a new kind of threat, something we as humans haven&#x27;t learned how to deal with.<p>Here&#x27;s some analysis from a game designer from 2015: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;lHcTKWiZ8sI" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;lHcTKWiZ8sI</a>
otherview大约 7 年前
This (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=lHcTKWiZ8sI" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=lHcTKWiZ8sI</a>) came out almost 3 years ago..
评论 #16603791 未加载
nmstoker大约 7 年前
Putting aside the specifics of the system in China, the underlying issues are a problem all countries need to explore. On many near capacity public systems it only takes a few bad actors to completely foul things up for entire sections, eg delaying a subway line. Traditional social pressure seems not to work anymore, for instance with this case on a train in the UK: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;2mpKu_x2s3w" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;2mpKu_x2s3w</a> In that case the train was delayed until eventually the guard said they had to allow the smoker to stay on the train or it would affect the line! Part of their argument was there were no signs saying you couldn&#x27;t smoke on the train (smoking is illegal inside in any public spaces!)
Gatsky大约 7 年前
I hope our era will be remembered for something other than the abject failure of liberal democracy. The US and Europe are struggling&#x2F;sabotaging themselves, while Russia and China just consolidate their power. Africa keeps burning. India will take the Sino-Russian path no doubt.
评论 #16607501 未加载
bawana大约 7 年前
This is WONDERFUL! no really. The first step to a world without money . Imagine a powerful govt AI keeping track of your karma and then determining what you can access, get or use. There won&#x27;t be any shortcuts or cheats. People with a lot of money will be on the same level as people without. The currency of success will be the help we give to each other. The only way this can work is of course a powerfully networked AI that is transparent. So if somebody seems to be at the top of the heap, everybody else can audit his&#x2F;her behavior data to see how he&#x2F;she got there. If this system is not transparent, then it is just another tool for the powerful to exploit the weak.
l3i2大约 7 年前
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.asiaone.com&#x2F;china&#x2F;woman-china-delays-high-speed-train-departure-blocking-door" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.asiaone.com&#x2F;china&#x2F;woman-china-delays-high-speed-t...</a><p>If you read this article, you will at least understand the reason why they introduce such law.<p>With 1.6 billion people, it&#x27;s common to see chaos when a single person doesn&#x27;t follow the rules, that woman in the news is a typical example. She didn&#x27;t get any punishment from the railway company, nor the police can do anything about her behaviour, simply because there is no such law exists. In the end, she got suspended from her job as a primary teacher!
Aunche大约 7 年前
This article is typical western fear-mongering. China can already arbitrarily detain political dissidents if they want to. This &quot;social credit score&quot; is nothing more than an elaborate system to enforce misdemeanor laws.
评论 #16603550 未加载
AboutTheWhisles大约 7 年前
Are we sure this is dystopian enough? I love the idea of taking someone who might be marginalized and marginalizing them even further, but how can we make sure it is passed down through the generations to their family?
评论 #16603759 未加载
charlysl大约 7 年前
And it&#x27;s not only that they can do this at all as if this wan&#x27;t already bad enough; on top of that neither the media, nor anyone else for that matter, can discuss&#x2F;critizice this in public other than to admire it.<p>Harmony.
lolc大约 7 年前
So what&#x27;s the current exchange rate between social credit and Yen?
rglover大约 7 年前
What a terrifying time to be alive.
cinquemb大约 7 年前
The systems&#x2F;databases that will process&#x2F;store the relevant social credit information will be prime targets for exploitation as this becomes more intertwined with practical daily life and automated systems.<p>Imagine being able to shut out a billion people variably by tampering with such and affecting the economy to a great degree.<p>And people complain about the evolving landscape of DDOS attacks now…
jakeogh大约 7 年前
Now pair that with &quot;basic income&quot;. Same thing will happen anywhere that awful idea is put in place. Got a ticket? No worries; we already deducted it;)<p>Public transit and free money are just two of many ways to increase the people&#x27;s dependence on the state. Next up is the &quot;opportunity&quot; of pre-programmed cars.
wemdyjreichert大约 7 年前
China is terrible. Their government is evil. If you&#x27;re there, get out. If not, stay out. &#x27;Nuff said.
smsm42大约 7 年前
Is it already being used to suppress criticism of the government and CPC, or is it planned for next month?
iooi大约 7 年前
So if we assume they&#x27;re getting their ideas from Black Mirror, how much longer until they start using humans for energy? [1]<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.imdb.com&#x2F;title&#x2F;tt2089049&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.imdb.com&#x2F;title&#x2F;tt2089049&#x2F;</a>
评论 #16602407 未加载
评论 #16602377 未加载
评论 #16602712 未加载
评论 #16602368 未加载
juanmirocks大约 7 年前
Black Mirror Nosedive (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Nosedive" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Nosedive</a>) social-status-like castes, only than in a real bluntly open dictatorship. Bad times.
yakcyll大约 7 年前
I get that it&#x27;s super anecdotal to mention this, but this idea sounds a lot like the worst oppressive, sadness-inducing systems I read about in school books, the purpose of which was literally to save people from thinking stuff like this up again.
JudasGoat大约 7 年前
I started working in electronics in the late 1970&#x27;s and as a &quot;drug criminal&quot; at the time, it became obvious to me that I was working on building my own handcuffs. I guess I really lacked vision because I didn&#x27;t see this coming.
Taniwha大约 7 年前
The main difference between this and the US is that in the US the no-fly list is secret
drumttocs8大约 7 年前
I already saw this episode on Black Mirror [0]. Is this a rerun?<p>[0] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.imdb.com&#x2F;title&#x2F;tt5497778&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.imdb.com&#x2F;title&#x2F;tt5497778&#x2F;</a>
olfactory大约 7 年前
This sounds horrible, but the &quot;Real Name&quot; movement for online services (such as Facebook) is an equally insidious American version. When a &quot;real name&quot; service becomes a financial services company, we have a merging of social metadata and a conventional credit score.<p>It does not start out as a dystopian vision. Why should Facebook charge advertisers money to show ads to people with a 400 credit score? The yield of many ads is improved when you have hard demographic and behavioral data as an additional filter.<p>What&#x27;s the difference between an Uber Pool rider getting a ride with other similarly-rated riders? Why should I with a near 5 star rating have to risk sitting in a pool with someone who has a 3.2 star rating? I certainly don&#x27;t want to.
评论 #16602887 未加载
评论 #16602732 未加载
fouric大约 7 年前
This is very, very bad.<p>Now, what can we do about it? What <i>should</i> we do about it?
hatsunearu大约 7 年前
Truly horrifying. China isn&#x27;t afraid to use technology and psychology to oppress its inhabitants in the maximum possible extent...<p>This is what North Korea would look like if they had money.
johnny99大约 7 年前
Wow--a crude implementation of Whuffie.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Whuffie" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Whuffie</a>
red_admiral大约 7 年前
Restrictions on flying for people who &#x27;cause trouble on flights&#x27; sounds like something I could support. Especially trouble of the drunken kind.
chrischen大约 7 年前
So they habe a nationalized yelp for people. If you’ve lived in China you’ll kmow there’s a big problem with corruption at higher levels and simply bad interpersonal behavior at lower levels (things like discourteousness and cutting in line).<p>Whether you agree or disagree with the implementation, some sorry of wuantified karma system is probably ne essary to keep people in line.<p>This is no different from privatized US credit system or a social shaming system (Chinese wouldn’t respond to shaming), except that this is implemented in a very Chinese way of being nationalized instead of privatized.
polskibus大约 7 年前
The big question is :<p>Is anyone going to sanction countries who bar people like that? Shouldn&#x27;t it be human right to be viewed outside any calculated measure?
daodedickinson大约 7 年前
No different from how Twitter, Facebook, and Google operate. People outside of the party are systematically humiliated and ground to dust.
MechEStudent大约 7 年前
They are already applying this to foreigners when selecting possible people to track, monitor, or engage.
jxramos大约 7 年前
So if one&#x27;s social credit score goes too low would they allow you emigrate to another country?
willart4food大约 7 年前
Black Mirror?
评论 #16602386 未加载
kwhitefoot大约 7 年前
&gt; “once untrustworthy, always restricted”<p>That&#x27;s even worse than California&#x27;s three strikes laws.
fspeech大约 7 年前
Here are the original documents in Chinese:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ndrc.gov.cn&#x2F;gzdt&#x2F;201803&#x2F;t20180316_879653.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ndrc.gov.cn&#x2F;gzdt&#x2F;201803&#x2F;t20180316_879653.html</a><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ndrc.gov.cn&#x2F;gzdt&#x2F;201803&#x2F;t20180316_879654.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ndrc.gov.cn&#x2F;gzdt&#x2F;201803&#x2F;t20180316_879654.html</a><p>The documents do not make &quot;bad social credit&quot; (whatever that means) a punishable cause. There is one clause relating to spread of false information but it specifically says &quot;false terrorism information related to civil aviation safety&quot;.<p>There are two classes of offenders. Air travel and luxury&#x2F;sleeper&#x2F;high speed G-train travels are banned; regular trains are not.<p>The first class of offences pertain to directly violating transport regulations, like refusing to quit smoking on an airplane, forcing one&#x27;s way onto the runway, or refusing to pay for a ticket even after getting caught riding the train without one.<p>The second class is credit related and has six categories. The first four categories are mostly targeted at resourceful people who have misdeeds but somehow are not criminally punished. One thing that conceivable casts a wider net is for those that refuse to pay social security insurance premiums or obtain social security payments through false documents. The fifth category is about people refusing to follow court orders. The sixth category about &quot;others&quot; that could be added is more elastic but it did say that changes need to be published by editing the document.<p>Google Translate of the six categories:<p>1. The party who has the ability to perform but refuses to perform major tax violations;<p>2. In the field of fiscal fund management and use, there is a person responsible for serious dishonest behaviors such as fraud, false reports, fraud, fraudulent taking, interception, misappropriation, arrears of international financial organizations and foreign governments’ due debts;<p>3. Those who have serious acts of dishonesty in the following areas in the field of social insurance: employers fail to participate in social insurance in accordance with relevant regulations and refuse rectification; employers have not faithfully applied for social insurance payment bases and have refused to make corrections; Those who have insurance premiums but have the capacity to pay but refuse to pay; conceal, transfer, embezzle, misappropriate social insurance funds or operate in violation of the regulations; fraudulently forge social insurance benefits through fraudulent or forgery proofs or other means; and social insurance service agencies violate the service agreement Or related regulations; refuses to assist the social insurance administrative department in the investigation and verification of accidents and problems;<p>4. Securities and futures are illegally punished with fines and no overdue payment; overdue entities of the listed company fail to perform their public commitments within the prescribed time limit;<p>5. The people&#x27;s courts have taken measures to restrict consumption in accordance with relevant regulations, or have included the list of those who have been breached trustees according to law;<p>(6) Other Restricted Persons Recognized by the Relevant Departments Responsible persons who commit serious acts of dishonesty in a civil aircraft shall be clearly identified by modifying the document.
meganibla大约 7 年前
Finally, The whuffie utopia has arrived.<p>To everyone scared: go on, keep being misinformed about everything China does. It’s a common but useless consolation trap to fall into.<p>Until you actually can see them clearly how can you start learning from their successes?
Bizarro大约 7 年前
And again and again, we have the usual suspects doing the usual things in every single one of these type of stories - every single one. I guess dang and others are ok with it.
glegouard大约 7 年前
It is sad to see that humans need such a system to respect rules and others. There is also the danger that the rules to respect change over time...
评论 #16605705 未加载
superflb大约 7 年前
This is not news. Some people refuse to pay their debts, but have money to take flights or high-speed trains. They should be banned.
tyrex2017大约 7 年前
better title would be: china expands list of people prohibited to use public transport<p>right now it is clickbait
zzzeek大约 7 年前
clicked on the comments for the link here just to see all the &quot;it&#x27;s essentially the same thing here in the US!&quot; posts and I was not disappointed. (or I was, depending on how you look at it)
评论 #16602838 未加载
abvdasker大约 7 年前
Do you want a dystopia? Because this is how you get a dystopia.
jm__87大约 7 年前
This comment section.. wow.
syntaxing大约 7 年前
Not really about the article, but the amount of Whataboutism has been growing uncomfortably stronger in the comments on Hacker News.<p>Actions of others is not enough to justify one&#x27;s self (good or bad). All these comments using Chinese&#x2F;USA or Western&#x2F;Eastern as their main point of argument is superfluous.
burntrelish1273大约 7 年前
I guess blogs to game &#x2F; improve social credit are inevitable, but I probably won&#x27;t be able to read them natively.
jonathanyc大约 7 年前
Once again, I’m disappointed in how quickly the comments on these articles about China doing horrible things devolves into defense of America. It’s sort of like a reverse whataboutism.<p>Ideally learning about what bad things other countries are doing would allow us to look at what similar things we do in our own country and then work to improve things. Instead the opposite seems to happen, and we actually draw a line under our current policies while saying “well, at least here...”.<p>Other people doing horrible things is not justification for us to do less horrible things. Conversely, because we do bad things doesn’t mean we can’t criticize the bad things others do. On the other hand, we are in a much better position to change things in our own country than in foreign countries.<p>I’ll end my commment by repeating that what China is doing here seems like a step in the wrong direction, and is not something we should be defending.
评论 #16608541 未加载
mavdi大约 7 年前
We&#x27;ll end up doing exactly the same here in the West. Just after much drama and a few terror attacks. I admire the Chinese for their efficiency.
joejerryronnie大约 7 年前
At what point does the ruling party in China finally overstep its bounds and incite a full-fledged violent revolution?
newnewpdro大约 7 年前
Get ready for more China stabbing sprees [1] as the consequences of this become increasingly felt by their society. This strikes me as an obviously bad idea, but perhaps there are no good solutions with a population of that size.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Chenpeng_Village_Primary_School_stabbing" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Chenpeng_Village_Primary_Schoo...</a>
评论 #16603288 未加载
meganibla大约 7 年前
Isn’t this actually a great idea?<p>If you don’t like it stop doing bad things and getting bad credit. If you behave you’ll have more privileges and be permitted to interact with others in more ways. It’s the basic social contract but implemented more efficiently. I can only imagine scofflaws is complaining.<p>If you complain it’s open to abuse well every human system not run by an uncrackable artificial intelligence is open to abuse. Don’t unfairly fear a Chinese system over a Western system when how do you know how clear your ideas are?<p>If you live under this system and really cannot stand or tolerate then just move to another country and cry out that you’re a fake victim and you can seek asylum from some generous Western nation wanting to pretend it’s morally supremacist.