Facebook CEO Zuckerberg conspicuously absent as data scandal grows

So I think Zuck&#x27;s presidential campaign is officially toast at this point.<p>Now what?

I would suppose with a video like <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;Uncle_Jimbo&#x2F;status&#x2F;976087974109736960" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;Uncle_Jimbo&#x2F;status&#x2F;976087974109736960</a> floating around, it does make for some uncomfortable questions.<p>You cannot keep saying you are neutral when you clearly get outraged when one side does something you let the other side do. Particularly when you shouldn&#x27;t of let anybody do it in the first place.

If Zuckerberg would ever has the balls to do right with facebook...<p>He got lucky in life, there is not much at how he became what he is by having any special character or much of experience.

Zuck isn&#x27;t absent. He&#x27;s just following the tried and true method of letting enough time pass by so that the public loses interest and moves on to the next big thing. Three months from now this will all be forgotten and it&#x27;s back to business as usual.

Could somebody give me a breakdown of the allegations? What exactly have they done with the data.

Companies give the silent treatment all the time but add on how terrible Zuckerberg is at public relations and even I really have trouble blaming Facebook for keeping him stashed away right now.

He&#x27;s finally learning that you can&#x27;t duck, spin, and charm your way out of everything.

Personally, I think he is doing the right thing. The more fb communicates the more the press is going after them. At this pt, fb should just stop communicating as that will give media less fodder to go after since they tend to dig into smaller details anyways to get more views.<p>A good counter example is Twitter which had equal if not more exposure on Russian ads but they have kept mum. And no one is going after them.