TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: How concerned should I be about liability when launching a site or spp?

15 点作者 mrbird超过 14 年前
As I understand it, when you operate a business or service as an individual (i.e., not a corporation), you're personally liable for whatever might happen.<p>What's the practical application for this when it comes to launching a site or an app? How concerned should you be? Is it ok to soft-launch, see how it goes, and only form an LLC (or equivalent) if/when you establish some growth?<p>Or should you incorporate from day one?<p>The kind of liability I'm most worried about is any damages (e.g. lawsuits) that might result from misuse of the service, such as spammy behavior, phishing, or the like.<p>Does anyone have advice or relevant experience you'd like to share? Has anyone gotten bitten unexpectedly by a liability? Am I exaggerating the likelihood or severity of the threat?

6 条评论

patio11超过 14 年前
Nothing in life is risk-free, but B2C Internet companies are close. You don't let liability risk stop you from cooking for guests or playing sports, both of which kill people.
bugsy超过 14 年前
It depends on what your app is. If it's some helpful consumer app that doesn't regulate airplane traffic, doesn't secretly install spyware, doesn't accidentally erase the hard drive when the wrong data is entered, your chance of trouble with customers is low in practice. And nonexistent if you are operating in a different country than your customers.<p>Your greatest risk is that of being sued by a competitor over patents because he would rather do that than create a better product.<p>Incorporating won't help if you are the developer, you are still liable for errors in your own work. Lawsuits against big companies don't usually name individual developers only because they don't have the deep pockets, and because they agreed to testify against their employer confessing their errors in return for being dropped from the lawsuit.<p>If you do want coverage, your option is to get E&#38;O (errors and omissions) insurance which covers liability up to a limit you pay for, and only covers you during the time you pay for it. So if your program is out in the wild and you are out of business and 10 years from now it causes data loss and you didn't maintain those premiums, you could still be tracked down and sued. Not very likely but remotely possible. The theoretical answer is to continue paying for E&#38;O forever, or license software only for specific time periods so you can safely shut down operations if needed.<p>Again, the chance of being sued is low. If you have insurance, they cover the cost of defending you in a lawsuit and also make you a less desirable target because it means there are insurance company lawyers defending against the claims, so chance of success in a lawsuit is smaller and can only be obtained at greater cost.<p>Most likely threat to you is really competitors coming after you with bogus patent claims, which can easily bankrupt you to fight against. Best way to avoid that is operate your business from a location that is difficult to bring legal actions in.
all超过 14 年前
You can incorporate later, but the decisions you make as a sole proprietor or sole trader can come back to haunt you even after incorporation. Your liability after incorporating will depend on the nature of the app and the way you bring it into your corporation. If damage results from a problem that a lawyer can demonstrate pre-existed and should have reasonably been taken care of before incorporation, you will be in his cross-hairs.<p>The extent of your liability will depend on where you live (the UK is harsher on developer responsibilities, IMO). IANAL, but I have worked as both sole trader and company director. Incorporation is dirt cheap compared to the cost of liability.
staunch超过 14 年前
Whether you're operating as a corporation or not it will still be very expensive to defend yourself.<p>If you're doing anything especially risky (torrent site) then setup a company on day one. Otherwise just put a good ToS on the site and don't worry about it. IANAL.
CatalystFactory超过 14 年前
@mrbird<p>This is very case dependent on what your site or app does.<p>Should it stop you from building it? Probably not.<p>If you don't incorporate or incorporate improperly, you'll likely be personally liable.<p>There are tax and legal consequences for launching without incorporating. You can always form later - but what is "ok" is again case dependent.<p>It would make sense to run your concerns by a lawyer or a community like HN, but to help we'd need to know more.<p>(Disclaimer: None of the above is legal advice or forms an attorney client relationship. The statements above are only for informational purposes and should be used at your own risk.)<p>@Staunch<p>It could be expensive either way, but being properly incorporated potentially will protect you from personal liability.
sgman超过 14 年前
&#62; Is it ok to soft-launch, see how it goes, and only form an LLC (or equivalent) if/when you establish some growth?<p>Yes.