TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Leaked email shows how Cambridge Analytica and Facebook first responded in 2015

146 点作者 node-bayarea大约 7 年前

7 条评论

andy_ppp大约 7 年前
The thing about AI enhanced propaganda is that it will learn exactly what to say to push your buttons and drive you further down a road away from reality towards something people want you to believe.<p>No one is impervious to this and I’ve seen many articles on both left and right that are completely false. We need to be very careful to do proper research on the likely correctness and fact checking of articles, images and even videos before they are shared, but you can go too far the other way if you try to automate this. Social media should probably warn you with algorithms if you share something likely to be false.
评论 #16669807 未加载
评论 #16671558 未加载
评论 #16670547 未加载
评论 #16672071 未加载
评论 #16669938 未加载
vinniejames大约 7 年前
Why is the media acting like this is a new revelation? <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;us-news&#x2F;2015&#x2F;dec&#x2F;11&#x2F;senator-ted-cruz-president-campaign-facebook-user-data" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;us-news&#x2F;2015&#x2F;dec&#x2F;11&#x2F;senator-ted-...</a>
5_minutes大约 7 年前
I really do think the momentum has become of Facebook’s demise.<p>Another side effect is that any other tech company (like Twitter) might close down their APIs etc even more.<p>One basic problem which I don’t understand from Facebook which could’ve prevented most of all this is: why aren’t the default settings of an account more secure and private?
评论 #16669381 未加载
评论 #16670317 未加载
评论 #16671615 未加载
ethbro大约 7 年前
If you ask a liar if they lied... what do you do with the answer you receive?
评论 #16670565 未加载
Bukhmanizer大约 7 年前
What are the rules on whos private data we&#x27;re allowed to steal and whos we aren&#x27;t?
forgotmypw大约 7 年前
Is there any way to view the email without going to businessinsider?
评论 #16670861 未加载
venning大约 7 年前
I believe the &quot;(2015)&quot; label is intended for <i>articles</i> from 2015. This article is from 2018, but its contents reference 2015. Perhaps a better title would be &quot;Leaked email shows how Cambridge Analytica and Facebook first responded in 2015&quot;.
评论 #16668999 未加载