TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How to read a patent in 60 seconds

89 点作者 danshapiro超过 14 年前

11 条评论

yagibear超过 14 年前
How to read the article in 5 seconds: Read the independent claims.
评论 #1668066 未加载
hristov超过 14 年前
I don't really agree. Yes in some respects and for some purposes the independent claims are the most important parts of a patent, but reading only the independent claims is very different from reading a patent.<p>The specification and drawings are important as they, among other things, define the meaning of the claims. Usually, if you just skip ahead to the independent claims you will have no idea what the claims are talking about. This is especially true in the electronics/software/online arts where people tend to make up their terminology as they go along.
评论 #1668061 未加载
tkeller超过 14 年前
Also important: understanding the difference between a patent <i>application</i> and an actual issued patent. The rule of thumb is that if it has a number in the millions, like 6,123,456, then it's a patent. If it starts with a year, like 2008/1234567, then it's an application. The slash may or may not be omitted.
bryanh超过 14 年前
A good chunk of advice for the dirty, messy world that is patents.<p>Unrelated: its very cool to randomly stumble upon someone using a theme I compiled: <a href="http://midmodesign.com/news/general/our-special-wordpress-theme/" rel="nofollow">http://midmodesign.com/news/general/our-special-wordpress-th...</a> :-)
pontifier超过 14 年前
This approach does seem to cut to the heart of the matter... I have had a patent in the system for a while, and just to reassure myself, I read just the independent claims.<p>While reviewing my patent I have always become worn out by the time I get to reviewing the claims so I have always been a little wary of them (especially because I am used to being as precise as I can, but claims are written to be interpreted broadly).<p>Sure enough, when I looked this time, the claims spoke loudly to me. What needs to be there is there in the independent claims.
troels超过 14 年前
So. How would I identify the independent claims?
评论 #1668634 未加载
noonespecial超过 14 年前
It is a little disturbing that the "code" of a patent (the claims) only takes about 30 seconds to read and the rest of the ream of paper is just comments and/or obfuscation. (Most likely the latter.)
评论 #1667778 未加载
rudyfink超过 14 年前
Also, remember that the meaning of the words and phrases in the independent claims are subject to intense debate.
scorpion032超过 14 年前
One other way: Post it to reddit denouncing it based on the title and read the top comment.
joshzayin超过 14 年前
&#62; Someone’s claiming you’re infringing your patent!<p>Uh...good luck with that.
RonDiver超过 14 年前
If you infringe the baby, you'll infringe the baby momma too.