The title of this article, while technically accurate, is a little clickbaity and seems to be appealing to the bandwagon of sentiments about Zuckerberg. Land rights in Hawaii can be less cut-and-dry than they are on the mainland. I'm not implying there isn't potential bullying involved here, but aside these suits are mostly by way of figuring out who might have a stake in the land so as to make them an offer for divestment.<p>> “It is common in Hawaii to have small parcels of land within the boundaries of a larger tract, and for the title to these smaller parcels to have become broken or clouded over time..."<p>>Zuckerberg has no intention of contesting any co-owner who can prove his or her interest in any of the land parcels.