Buzzword Convergence: Making Sense of Quantum Neural Blockchain AI

Since we&#x27;re in a whimsical mood:<p>&quot;There’s a function called Hash in the Wolfram Language, and for example applying it to the previous paragraph of text gives 8643827914633641131.&quot;<p>I was a bit saddened to see that this was not &quot;applying it to <i>this</i> paragraph of text gives…&quot;, which would have been quite the party trick.

Come back to me when I can have <i>serverless</i> quantum neural blockchain AI.

Came here to find an “April fools”, instead it’s a mostly serious article, albeit a tad tongue in cheek.

Surprised that nobody&#x27;s called out SingularityNet [1] as a serious venture along these lines (sans &quot;quantum&quot;).<p>&quot;By combining open source principles, blockchain integration, and leading minds in machine learning we will make AI a global commons for all.&quot;<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singularitynet.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singularitynet.io&#x2F;</a>

&gt; And the act of that measurement would in effect force the blockchain to pick a definite history.<p>Wouldn&#x27;t there be divergence, the further back in history you go between picks, due to collisions? Or is this what the reversible nature of the hashes take care of?

An awesome glimpse into the coming buzzword singularity!