TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Gwynne Shotwell: SpaceX's Plan to Fly You Across the Globe in 30 Minutes [video]

89 点作者 logancg大约 7 年前

13 条评论

aphextron大约 7 年前
Rocket based travel will never ever ever happen on a widespread scale simply because of the G forces involved. Passengers on an airliner will begin feeling uncomfortable at around 1.2 G's and > 20 degrees of bank angle. The thought of subjecting regular paying passengers to 3+ G's and a full 360 degrees of pitch/roll is absurd. It could definitely be a niche thing for people that are physically fit, but this just isn't the way to go for high speed transportation. More traditional airframes and scramjets are far more likely to make hypersonic travel a reality.
评论 #16906513 未加载
评论 #16907253 未加载
评论 #16906427 未加载
评论 #16911870 未加载
评论 #16907845 未加载
评论 #16907532 未加载
评论 #16906613 未加载
评论 #16906391 未加载
bmcusick大约 7 年前
The main thing I'm thinking of is noise pollution. You think living near an airport is loud? I cannot even imagine what living near a BFR spaceport would be like. For coastal cities maybe it would be worth it to build a landing pad on an ocean platform some miles out to sea, but what about for cities like Atlanta or Beijing? There's nowhere around them to build that isn't already a suburb.
评论 #16907270 未加载
评论 #16906984 未加载
评论 #16906404 未加载
WhompingWindows大约 7 年前
I think SpaceX should just sell this service to military clients. The other comments here are talking about noise pollution, G-forces, bank angles, and other negative downsides of the service. However, if you have a bunch of active-duty, trained personnel who need to get across the globe ASAP, this is something I could see the military paying for. Moreover, most bases are not directly next to large population centers, which helps with the noise pollution argument.
larrydag大约 7 年前
As a business model I think SpaceX should be a manufacturer and not in the transportation business akin to Boeing or Airbus. There is a ton of logistics involved in transporting people globally. Of course there is the safety issues as well.
评论 #16907075 未加载
评论 #16906286 未加载
评论 #16906768 未加载
jacquesm大约 7 年前
Betting against Elon Musk is historically unprofitable but if there was one of those bets saying that SpaceX will never actually field this other than for PR purposes then I'd probably take it.
ChuckMcM大约 7 年前
I&#x27;m glad Gwynne is talking about this rather than Elon as I always take what Elon says with a large grain of &quot;execution&quot; salt (as in sure you can do that but not when you think you can).<p>Things will be very different when BFRs are flying regularly. BFRs imply full reusability, and full reusability implies a short &#x27;cycle&#x27; time, which implies a much greater earth to orbit capacity, with implies a greater supply and more reliability to orbit, which implies that it stops being crazy to require that you have three or four launches in a single year to get all of your &quot;stuff&quot; into orbit.<p>The logistics of space launch are still crazy. You can launch two rockets in a weekend using two launch pads but you can&#x27;t yet launch multiple rockets a week from the <i>same</i> launch pad.
hackpert大约 7 年前
I think a major point that isn&#x27;t being talked enough about in public (although I&#x27;m sure people in SpaceX have considered it before coming up with numbers) with the &quot;point-to-point&quot; transport system is simple demand-supply economics. Sure, let&#x27;s say they can run 10 100-person flights per day from New York to Shanghai but do that many people even want to travel that route on that particular day?
评论 #16907185 未加载
Animats大约 7 年前
This is going to be big with the crowd that has jumbo jets as a personal airplane.[1]<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.businessinsider.com&#x2F;boeing-747-8-vip-private-jet-2016-6" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.businessinsider.com&#x2F;boeing-747-8-vip-private-jet-...</a>
pjmorris大约 7 年前
How do you tell the difference between commercial scheduled rocket flights and incoming ICBM&#x27;s?
评论 #16906619 未加载
评论 #16906451 未加载
评论 #16908036 未加载
评论 #16906523 未加载
评论 #16906536 未加载
评论 #16907069 未加载
评论 #16907665 未加载
Semirhage大约 7 年前
What would be the environmental impact of ubiquitous rocket launches for business travel?
评论 #16905878 未加载
评论 #16906264 未加载
评论 #16905861 未加载
评论 #16905995 未加载
评论 #16905963 未加载
评论 #16905973 未加载
jedisct1大约 7 年前
Does that mean no food, no snacks during the flight? That sucks.
评论 #16908436 未加载
评论 #16907470 未加载
mkirklions大约 7 年前
SpaceX is promising something that is feasibly decades away?<p>Do people still believe in Elon? Or have we figured out these are advertisements.
评论 #16906157 未加载
评论 #16908497 未加载
cthulhujr大约 7 年前
&gt;This is the only time I&#x27;ve out-visioned Elon ... <i>I</i> want to meet other people in other solar systems.<p>You&#x27;re not out-visioning Elon; it&#x27;s a petty attempt at one-upmanship. It just doesn&#x27;t seem genuine. I want to meet people in other Superclusters. Now she&#x27;s been out-visioned!
评论 #16905640 未加载
评论 #16905693 未加载
评论 #16905842 未加载
评论 #16905933 未加载
评论 #16906251 未加载