TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Game Theory Explains the Eligible-Bachelor Paradox

42 点作者 kradic大约 17 年前

8 条评论

fortes大约 17 年前
I'm surprised the article doesn't mention the fact that men readily date women who are significantly younger -- while the same is not particularly common in women. Men have a much larger pool of candidates as they get older (while women had a larger one when they were younger)
评论 #170496 未加载
评论 #169972 未加载
评论 #170566 未加载
dnaquin大约 17 年前
Anyone who's actually looked at the math behind this knows that this simplification only works out when an entire gender are strong bidders. Otherwise, the solution set lies somewhere in between the extremes. So the author's simplification makes his claim. Without the simplification, his claim weakens significantly.
dangoldin大约 17 年前
All the eligible bachelors are coding of course! I didn't need to read the article to know that.
mynameishere大约 17 年前
<i>Shouldn't there be about as many highly eligible and appealing men as there are attractive, eligible women?</i><p>I read this sentence several times trying to undo the brain-fuck that it did to me. The internet is awash in balderdash, but when you come across a superbly brazen falsehood like this, your defenses tend to fall away.<p>Now--what and where are these allegedly existent, even numerous, women? The vast majority of women, at least 99 percent, have some combination of eating disorder [1], television-induced personality necrosis, age beyond or near-beyond the breeding years, "baggage" (children, alcoholism, etc), or straightforward ugliness.<p>[1] Not anorexia nervosa--the opposite.
评论 #170205 未加载
评论 #169927 未加载
ardit33大约 17 年前
It comes down to some women, are so fricking picky. I mean, way to pickier than guys, and unrealsticly so.<p>One thing the article failed to mention; is that women in their late 20's and early 30s are already past their prime years of reproduction, and usually getting less attractive (example, most miss universe are under 25). So they are becoming less desirable then their mid 20s counterparts, hence it is natural, in a perfect market, that they will have to settle of something less they could get when they were 24-27 (what can be considered prime years for women).
budu3大约 17 年前
I wonder if it asserts or refutes this claim, couples with similar attributes will get hitched. <a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/view/1831130?seq=3" rel="nofollow">http://www.jstor.org/stable/view/1831130?seq=3</a>
patrocles大约 17 年前
Gimein's troll-baiting....<p>The 2000 census shows that the US has more unmarried females than males. However, the Census also divides unmarried people into three groups: never-married, divorced, and widowed. [<a href="http://www.census.gov/population/cen2000/phc-t27/tab04.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.census.gov/population/cen2000/phc-t27/tab04.pdf</a>]<p>Looking at the data, we find that widowed females dwarf males (presumably due to females living 8 years longer on average while the average marriage age delta has been stable at 2-3 years), and that males remarry easier than females (or females don't want to remarry ;).<p>In the never-married category, males dwarf females. Running the numbers by state, we find the ratio of males to females as:<p>State/Non-state Never-Married Males to Never-Married Females<p>District of Columbia 0.96<p>Maryland 1.04<p>Delaware 1.06<p>New York 1.07<p>Rhode Island 1.07<p>Massachusetts 1.07<p>Louisiana 1.08<p>Mississippi 1.1<p>Pennsylvania 1.11<p>Connecticut 1.11<p>South Carolina 1.13<p>Alabama 1.13<p>New Jersey 1.13<p>Illinois 1.14<p>Ohio 1.14<p>New Mexico 1.16<p>Michigan 1.16<p>Missouri 1.16<p>Virginia 1.16<p>Vermont 1.17<p>Maine 1.17<p>New Hampshire 1.18<p>Georgia 1.18<p>Indiana 1.19<p>Tennessee 1.19<p>Wisconsin 1.19<p>North Carolina 1.2<p>Utah 1.2<p>Minnesota 1.2<p>Iowa 1.22<p>Arkansas 1.22<p>Texas 1.22<p>Kentucky 1.22<p>West Virginia 1.23<p>California 1.24<p>Nebraska 1.24<p>Florida 1.24<p>Kansas 1.26<p>Oregon 1.26<p>Washington 1.27<p>Oklahoma 1.27<p>South Dakota 1.28<p>Arizona 1.28<p>Colorado 1.3<p>Idaho 1.31<p>Hawaii 1.33<p>Wyoming 1.33<p>Montana 1.33<p>North Dakota 1.36<p>Nevada 1.42<p>Alaska 1.45<p>The Census does not account for geographic clustering of sexual preferences, so assuming Gimein's observation held up with additional data gathering, he may live in a sexual-preference skewed location and/or Alaska.
eat_my_shorts大约 17 年前
<i>leaving a disproportionate number of men who are notably imperfect (perhaps they are short,</i><p>Short != imperfect. It's not some flaw. I'm perfect the way God made me, and the author can eat my shorts.
评论 #169815 未加载
评论 #169774 未加载