Lobe – Deep Learning Made Simple

This reminds me of Unreal&#x27;s blueprints. You could get a surprising amount of work done just via blueprints and not touch C++ code.<p>You&#x27;d have to balance the input and output connection&#x27;s granularity - too many would put off users, too few would make users feel restricted. If you manage to find a sweet spot, or let the user pick the level of expertise, and reveal them accordingly, it would be perfect.<p>I really like how good it looks, and can&#x27;t wait to use it myself!

Is there any backstory of how this came together?<p>I just watched the video, and one of the first thoughts was mike matas’s 2016 video “the brain” where he made an NN within quartz composer: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;eUEr4P_RWDA" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;eUEr4P_RWDA</a>

This is really cool. What will the pricing model be down the road? For instance, if I were to use these models and the cloud API to service a main feature of my application, what ballpark are you thinking of in terms of monthly cost?

Wish there was a small demo to try but it looks great; It kind of reminds me of the same type of sandbox&#x2F;experimentation environment you get with Tensorflow Playground (albeit not constrained to a few sample sets of data). I look forward to seeing how this product turns out.

I have a couple of questions -<p>Do you have a team implementing most of the new state-of-the-art model architectures (given how fast new ones keep getting published)?<p>If so, I&#x27;m assuming you keep associating some types of model architectures to the type of data being input? I&#x27;m just curious how you&#x27;d pick a particular architecture.<p>On the other hand, AutoML comes to mind, but IMO, the biggest hurdle of AutoML, and its ilk is the massive computational infrastructure requirements.<p>But great job, it looks really good and seems pretty intuitive!

First time I read Deep Learning and simple on the same sentence and it&#x27;s actually simple. Looking forward to use it.

I personally really like the design and looks super approachable. Can’t wait to try it out!

I&#x27;m blown away by the effectiveness of the whole product. While being approachable for beginners, it seems to allow experts to tweak at will. It&#x27;s a massive &quot;tour de force&quot;.<p>The marketplace play mentioned in other comments seems like a thing to try. I confirm I would pay for querying predictions through the API.<p>Such a polished product for 3 folks. Kudos!

Awesomely done ! What i really like is that, in addition to the ease of deploying a model, this product also lets you visualize the activations of the neural network. I mean you could build the visualizations in Jupyter but the ease of toggling the layers, such as switching of Max-Pool etc is super helpful for understanding how neural nets work.

Pretty excited about this, I&#x27;ve been on the edge of my seat waiting to hear back from Google after applying for the AutoML alpha but this looks even better, especially because it allows exporting the model which AutoML has not promised yet.<p>Also AFAIK AutoML alpha initially only supports vision tasks while this allows nearly any input type.

Hey everyone! One of the cofounders of Lobe here - let us know if you have any questions.

This looks awesome. I liked the demonstration of real-world applications with the water tank.<p>From a deep-learning novice: Can you give a rough idea of the processing cost of doing something like setting up your water tank level recognition?

Looks really impressive! Acumos plan to do something similar? <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;marketplace.acumos.org&#x2F;#&#x2F;home" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;marketplace.acumos.org&#x2F;#&#x2F;home</a>

This looks AMAZING! I love the UX approach to balancing simplicity and complexity. For instance, giving the granular control over the hyper-parameters in a visual way with immediate feedback is a whole level above any other design I&#x27;ve seen out there that tries to make deep learning more accessible.<p>Awesome work and I hope to see the product grow!

I think there are something like this, don&#x27;t know what the difference, can someone give a compare:<p>deep learning studio: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;deepcognition.ai&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;deepcognition.ai&#x2F;</a><p>knime: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.knime.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.knime.com&#x2F;</a> (have deep learning plugin)<p>runwayml: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;runwayml.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;runwayml.com&#x2F;</a> (in beta, did not open for public)

Great, great work! Congratulations!<p>Do you support transfer-learning, for instance, pre-trained models on ImageNet? A lot of problems have limited dataset, and can only work by training the last layers of a pre-trained model?<p>And do you support training on cloud-based public datasets? Uploading a large public dataset doesn&#x27;t make much sense.<p>Really looking forward to trying your platform!

Looks great keep up the awesome work!

Very cool, any plans to bring it to desktop as well? Seems like this could be a very useful tool for people getting into deep learning, but may not necessarily be targeting mobile. (From the landing page, it seems mobile-only.)

Are there some tools like this but for deep&#x2F;machine learning internals&#x2F;theorys&#x2F;math study&#x2F;research rather then practical deep learning ?

Given how polished it is I expect this isn&#x27;t a free service, but I can&#x27;t see any info about pricing&#x2F;how payment works

Is this a standalone application or a web service?

Is this a good way to build a board game AI? If I have a db 50,000 replays would this be the right tool to build it?

Great job ! any information about pricing ?

Impressive!

TL;DR - GUI for building Bayesian classifiers?!

great design!