TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Design Thinking vs. Data Thinking

17 点作者 KuraFire超过 14 年前

4 条评论

flyosity超过 14 年前
A good article, and applicable also to why some of Google's projects succeed and others fail. What fail? Ones that rely upon a deep understanding of social interactions: Orkut, Buzz, Wave. These social applications/networks don't have a specific <i>purpose</i> they just <i>are</i> and people can use them how they want. Compare that to Gmail, Google Docs, AdWords. Singularly-purposed applications that no one disagrees about how they should be used. Google is great at solving problems, not so great at creatively thinking about situations that may not be problems and may not have a direct solution.
评论 #1699024 未加载
评论 #1698886 未加载
hung超过 14 年前
The problem I have with this article is that it describes Google's designs as "bland" but gives no examples. What exactly is bland about which products?<p>The problem with too much "design thinking" is that you end up trying to "innovate" without taking user needs into perspective. To a designer aching to flex his design muscles, a clean and usable design probably comes off as "bland."<p>I'd argue that Google is much more usable than its competitors. They don't overdo their design, and that's a good thing.
Symmetry超过 14 年前
While I distrust the author's claims to be able to reliably distinguish devices created by data thinking and design thining irrespective of final quality (I'm having a hard time thinking of a situation more rife with the potential for hindsight bias) he does make a number of good points.<p>Perhaps the best was that if you're trying to grow a market then being like your competitors is probably the wrong was to go about. A common expression of mockery with a group of friends is that a company is "trying to differentiate by embracing the dominant paradigm." These seems related.
zachrose超过 14 年前
Perhaps UI design and hardware design are not directly comparable on this basis? You can't run automated testing or user analytics on a handset.<p>What's more to the point, testing is for increasing a specific outcome or make sure it happens. It's not about what Christopher Alexander would call "the quality without a name."