TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Senate has forced a vote to restore net neutrality

365 点作者 vwadhwani大约 7 年前

11 条评论

tzs大约 7 年前
&gt; Reddit, Tumblr, Etsy and other sites have put up Red Alert banners as part of a day of action to drive petitions in support of the resolution.<p>This is being seriously mismanaged, and that may actually cause long term harm to the chances of saving (or restoring) net neutrality.<p>The big mistake being made is not explaining where the Congressional Review Act (CRA) approach fits into the bigger picture. There are several places along the timeline of net neutrality repeal where it in theory could be saved. The Congressional Review Act (CRA) approach is just one of them.<p>The CRA approach has almost no chance of actually passing both houses (it has a pretty good chance in the Senate, but because of the way the House is structured it would take a miracle there).<p>When you consider it in the context of the bigger picture, that&#x27;s not a problem. Its role in the overall effort is to get members of Congress on the record, which might be useful later in campaigns for office. The public is broadly in favor of net neutrality and this support is very high even among Republicans.<p>That&#x27;s probably not enough to get Republican voters to vote Democrat, because it is not high on the list of important issues for them, but it could be enough to get them to vote for more moderate Republicans in the Republican primaries or caucuses.<p>In sports terms, this is not a play to score a goal. It is an attempt to get better position to set up a later scoring play. But the people running these campaigns treat everything like it is a scoring attempt...and then when it doesn&#x27;t score the people who participated feel like they failed.<p>That can discourage them, making them less likely to respond to later calls to action. Then they might not be there when it is time to actually go for a goal (e.g., get out and vote).
评论 #17038147 未加载
评论 #17039615 未加载
nateconq大约 7 年前
&quot;would need a bare majority in both the Senate and the House, as well as the president’s signature&quot;<p>&quot;We don’t know how this is going to end....&quot;<p>They know very well how it will end. This is an effort to get ammo for the primaries.
评论 #17036916 未加载
craftyguy大约 7 年前
&gt; Reddit, Tumblr, Etsy and other sites have put up Red Alert banners as part of a day of action to drive petitions in support of the resolution.<p>I get the feeling that these sites are just &#x27;preaching to the choir&#x27; (i.e. their customers already support these things, and most likely have let their &#x27;representative&#x27; know).<p>Is anyone doing anything to give the 50 senators who are against this a taste of what is to come? I recall cloudflare or someome along those lines threatenning to throttle traffic from government IPs, or maybe that just happened in my dream..
评论 #17036291 未加载
评论 #17036501 未加载
评论 #17036618 未加载
评论 #17036735 未加载
评论 #17036292 未加载
boomboomsubban大约 7 年前
This is an almost meaningless bill, only going to a vote so various politicians can claim to support net neutrality on the campaign trail.<p>Not only is it unlikely to pass both chambers and be signed by the president, passing the bill doesn&#x27;t change the broader status of net neutrality. Currently, the legality of the FCC enforcing net neutrality is unclear, with the matter destined to be decided in the courts either way.<p>A law explicitly giving the FCC control has been necessary for over a decade, but both parties have refused to pass one or even consider passing a future one.
ryanpcmcquen大约 7 年前
I find it funny that some people still see Net Neutrality as &#x27;government controlling the internet&#x27;. They should take a look at FOSTA if they want to know what government controlling the internet really looks like.
评论 #17036839 未加载
评论 #17037652 未加载
评论 #17039593 未加载
jordigh大约 7 年前
I still can&#x27;t believe that the movement to kill net neutrality was (is?) called &quot;restoring internet freedom&quot;. I guess it&#x27;s a shortening of &quot;restoring internet service providers&#x27; freedom&quot;? But the longer form isn&#x27;t as catchy.
评论 #17036301 未加载
评论 #17037214 未加载
评论 #17036268 未加载
评论 #17038028 未加载
评论 #17036365 未加载
yosito大约 7 年前
If you live in Arkansas, Louisiana, or Ohio, call your senators and urge them to vote in favor of net neutrality!
WheelsAtLarge大约 7 年前
Wishful thinking, the president would not sign the bill and there&#x27;s not a supermajority in the Senate and the house to overrule him. This is going nowhere.
评论 #17037882 未加载
enknamel大约 7 年前
Why do we need NN? I have yet to hear any valid argument for it. Everything that people complain about is already illegal under multiple laws.
评论 #17044286 未加载
mnw21cam大约 7 年前
This is about the USA. Perhaps the title could be updated to say &quot;The US Senate...&quot;?
ghba66大约 7 年前
Why are people here so pro-net neutrality? I don&#x27;t have NN in Europe and I&#x27;m happy: because of it, I enjoy zero-rated services at a fair price.
评论 #17037491 未加载
评论 #17037567 未加载
评论 #17037455 未加载
评论 #17038258 未加载