TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

WHOIS blackout period likely starting in May

152 点作者 morninj大约 7 年前

20 条评论

clay_the_ripper大约 7 年前
I really wish WHOIS would go away forever. There is absolutely no point to it. If you don’t pay to get your name private, you get SPAMMED to such an incredible degree, it’s absolutely awful. Literally 10+ calls a day, emails voicemails. So you have to buy the “privacy protection” thing, which defeats the whole purpose anyway. All WHOIS does is create an industry of people selling privacy to WHOIS. This whole narrative about “journalism” and it being used for research sounds like nonsense to me. Something tells me these people have a vested financial interest in this. Would love to hear an alternate point of view on this.
评论 #17080144 未加载
评论 #17080164 未加载
评论 #17079431 未加载
评论 #17079347 未加载
评论 #17079364 未加载
评论 #17078890 未加载
kbar13大约 7 年前
domain registration data is in a weird place for the modern internet. I can see the value of having a real registry when it was first developed, but now it seems like a pretty easy way for people to shoot themselves in the foot with regards to privacy. Also, some registrars charge a premium for WHOIS privacy. It should not cost extra to have your legal name and address to be hidden from the entirety of the internet.
评论 #17077563 未加载
评论 #17076646 未加载
评论 #17076272 未加载
评论 #17077456 未加载
phit_大约 7 年前
thank god, tired of paying extra for &quot;whois privacy&quot; that various registers offer<p>running a hobby project should not require you to share your private contact details with the world
评论 #17076662 未加载
评论 #17076891 未加载
评论 #17076264 未加载
评论 #17076287 未加载
robalfonso大约 7 年前
In the short term WHOIS is going to be limited to just the registrant organization, state, country and a masked email address (Admin and Technical fields will be removed save email). This is short term to come into compliance with GDPR.<p>Long term ICANN intends to create a privileged group (other registrars, law enforcement, etc) Who will be able to get to the full whois data. So a sort of tiered system. Expect this to take a minimum of a year. The ICANN multi stake holder model means nothing happens fast.
评论 #17078130 未加载
评论 #17079498 未加载
评论 #17077805 未加载
评论 #17081313 未加载
holstvoogd大约 7 年前
ICANN is scrambling to be compliant they write... We&#x27;ve all had 2 years notice since the GPDR has been adopted! And if you &#x27;didnt know&#x27;, you have bigger organizational problems.<p>I understand it is a lot of annoying work, but adtech and data brokers (etc etc) have been gutting privacy and the internet for long enough. We&#x27;ve let it come this far, now we get regulated.<p>(disclaimer: I only started working on compliance this year, do as I say, not as I do ;))
评论 #17083991 未加载
评论 #17085817 未加载
becauseiam大约 7 年前
The WHOIS blackout has already started, I recently registered a domain with a non-European ccTLD, but with Gandi for the registrar. The WHOIS reads:<p><pre><code> Administrative Contact: Not displayed due to GDPR</code></pre>
评论 #17077136 未加载
walrus01大约 7 年前
there is another type of whois that people don&#x27;t ordinarily interact with, but is essential for the correct operation of the internet...<p>ARIN, RIPE, APNIC and AFRINIC run whois databases for IP space. Network operators use them to find who controls chunks of v4 space (ranging from the globally-minimum-announceable &#x2F;24 to &#x2F;12). ISPs can use tools like SWIP to point the whois for a block of space in use by a customer to that customer&#x27;s whois info.<p>I sincerely hope that this doesn&#x27;t become more difficult to use, because it will make basic network diagnostics at a WAN scale much more annoying.<p>The good news is that the typical ISP-level info in IP space whois databases doesn&#x27;t fall under the GPDR, since most are role accounts (abuse@ispname.com , noc@ispname.com, etc). Also generic phone numbers for NOC and network engineering groups. However, a lot of ISPs <i>do</i> currently have individual persons listed as points of contact in their whois entries.
pferde大约 7 年前
I&#x27;m just wondering why ICANN is &quot;scrambling to get it GDPR-compliant&quot; just now, at the eleventh hour. They had just as much time as rest of the world to do it sooner, without any interim modes, and without any rush and all the problems that can come from hastiness.
评论 #17081009 未加载
7ewis大约 7 年前
Noticed this the other day, my own domain is already blacked out.<p>I used to put fake info there anyway, I don&#x27;t want my domain linked to my home address, or provide an easy way for spammers to get my email.
评论 #17078880 未加载
alerighi大约 7 年前
Having a public register that tells you who owns a particular domain or IP address could be useful for a lot of things. Sure, they could take away a lot of fields that are not necessary and might be a privacy problem, like address and phone number, today it&#x27;s useless, and maybe instead add a GPG public key, so much useful, and keep name and email address.<p>But don&#x27;t remove it, it&#x27;s a useful thing I use a lot, most of the times for security purpose, you see a suspicious IP address or domain while observing a packet capture, WHOIS tells you who owns it, you find in a log an IP address that tries to bruteforce into your server, WHOIS tells you who it is and gives you an address to contact and ask explanations, you need to find a person to contact if you have a problem with a website, contact the email address in the WHOIS record of the domain, you are sure that you are contacting the right person, even if the site gets hacked in the worst way the WHOIS record can&#x27;t change.
lima大约 7 年前
I work for a popular hosting company and WHOIS data is causing constants issues - mostly for non-technical customers, but on one occasion, I accidentally used my work mail address during testing. The WHOIS database for, say, the .net zone is extensively mined by spammers and telemarketers.<p>I received a torrent of marketing mails for months even though I immediately changed it to a noreply mail address. We receive numerous complaints from customers who ignored our warnings.
lumberingjack大约 7 年前
Back in 2002 teenager me used WHOIS to lookup my ISP&#x27;s (adelphia) phone number. Some guy picked up the phone in their server room no shit. He answers the phone like it&#x27;s a internal only line &quot;server room Jim here how can I help?&quot; Me: &quot;ya um I have a problem with my SMTP port can you help out?&quot; Net Admin &quot;How did you get this number! but ya I can help kid&quot;
chx大约 7 年前
My quick and dirty three step scam website detecting process <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;travel.stackexchange.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;84026&#x2F;4188" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;travel.stackexchange.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;84026&#x2F;4188</a> obviously includes whois but -- I think I will make do without. It&#x27;s only a little harder, to be frank.
mirimir大约 7 年前
So will firms like <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.domaintools.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.domaintools.com&#x2F;</a> need to redact their whois history data? They&#x27;re in Seattle, for whatever that&#x27;s worth.
atesti大约 7 年前
Does this also apply to RIPE for the whois of an IP address?
评论 #17078612 未加载
NoSalt大约 7 年前
I&#x27;m good with this. I don&#x27;t like the fact that some yahoo can look me up and come after me just because he might not like what is on my website.
techsin101大约 7 年前
whois guard is a joke so i welcome this
jiveturkey大约 7 年前
good.<p>-grumpycat
oliwarner大约 7 年前
I don&#x27;t understand the problem. When buying a domain you do so in ICANN&#x27;s jurisdiction, under their terms. Actively and voluntarily forfeiting your right to privacy should trump statutory privacy.<p>And if that isn&#x27;t enough, ICANN can fix this without compromise. One mass email. &quot;Respond expressly allowing us to publish your PII, or lose your domain.&quot;
评论 #17078628 未加载
评论 #17078623 未加载
MR4D大约 7 年前
This is stupid.<p>What happens next - do patents and copyrights have owner’s right to be forgotten?<p>If so, then who do you sue for stealing your copyright?<p>The intent is good - let me be clear about that. But the implementation is having second order affects that are going to f<i></i>* with things in a big way because it wasn’t thought through as thoroughly as it should have been. *<p>* Key thought here is that it might be extremely difficult to think through all the second order effects, which suggests to me that a better phase in process should have been implemented.<p>EDIT - Not sure why this is being voted down. If i’m Not clear here, then please see my follow-on comment for (hopefully) a more clear view of my position. I’m not saying Whois is stupid - I’m saying GDPR is (due to the lack of thinking around second-order effects).
评论 #17079668 未加载
评论 #17081315 未加载
评论 #17081579 未加载