TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction

293 点作者 Lionsion将近 7 年前

20 条评论

aj7将近 7 年前
When the NY Times covered the Chinese robotic moon landing, it was in the top 10 stories for more than a week. In the most space-jaded country on the planet. The rating was sustained by constant comments by Chinese studying in the US and burnishing their reps with the Party. You can almost always make Chinese English, an AI program could be trained to do it. I wrote to their ombudsman. Down in a day.
评论 #17104378 未加载
评论 #17105846 未加载
评论 #17104480 未加载
评论 #17104250 未加载
评论 #17104612 未加载
评论 #17106269 未加载
pow_pp_-1_v将近 7 年前
Interesting. The whole thing is so simple. A government wants to get their message out quickly and efficiently before negative stories get too much attention. So, how to do it cost effectively? Simple, ask normal government employees to write pro-government posts on social media when they get time. Plus their career prospects improve if they do it. Finally a reminder on certain days about their duty to spread the good news about the government.<p>I guess the only weakness in the whole scheme is people reporting back to an authority about their work. I am pretty sure they got rid of that after the leak. The genius of this thing is that if you ask the people who write these posts if they are doing propaganda, there&#x27;s a good chance that their initial genuine response will be to say no.
评论 #17106810 未加载
评论 #17105388 未加载
pteredactyl将近 7 年前
This is great.<p>Please, please let this concept enter the general public&#x27;s mind.
评论 #17104175 未加载
评论 #17105860 未加载
评论 #17103872 未加载
评论 #17103953 未加载
评论 #17105289 未加载
woodandsteel将近 7 年前
Xi is a very smart fellow, and he seems to sincerely want what is best for his country. That said, I think he is making some terrible mistakes. Instead of helping the population become smarter, better-informed thinkers, he is trying to turn them into robots.<p>Xi is creating an illusion of unity, which means if things start to go seriously wrong, there will be an explosion, as happened so many times in China&#x27;s past. Citizens will lack the sort of intelligence and ability to work together that would be needed to resolve problems, and the country likely will either fall into chaos or under the rule of a malevolent emperor.<p>Let me add that Xi claims to be following Confucian principles, but that is not at all true. Confucianism is a set of principles that everyone from the top down was required to follow. Xi, in contrast, answers to no one, and is simply making up his own rules.<p>To the Chinese out there, let me say that what you need to do is get your hands on all the information you can from independent sources, and study political philosophy, so that you will be in a better position to make intelligent decisions in the future.
评论 #17104847 未加载
评论 #17104986 未加载
johnchristopher将近 7 年前
&gt; Many academics, and most journalists and activists, claim that these so-called 50c party posts vociferously argue for the government’s side in political and policy debates. As we show, this is also true of most posts openly accused on social media of being 50c.<p>I am not a native speaker. I can&#x27;t parse that sentence :&#x2F;.<p>Why is this `also` true ? In addition to what ? Wouldn&#x27;t it follow that posts arguing in favour of the government&#x27;s side are tagged as `50c` since `50c` seems to be defined by being `pro government` ?<p>And then:<p>&gt; [..] we show that the Chinese regime’s strategy is to avoid arguing with skeptics of the party and the government, and to not even discuss controversial issues.<p>If I ignore the `also` word in the first quote it all makes sense.
评论 #17104583 未加载
评论 #17104657 未加载
评论 #17104673 未加载
评论 #17104511 未加载
评论 #17105240 未加载
mindfulhack将近 7 年前
I love it when we have moments like this where truth comes out (in the form of scientific research if need be) that previously was moronically dismissed (by people including government shills I&#x27;m sure) as &#x27;conspiracy theory&#x27;.<p>Snowden and NSA spying was another one. Truth is not as boring as they may make you want to believe. The world is very, VERY interesting and you just have to discover it.
JumpCrisscross将近 7 年前
&quot;In contrast to prior claims, we show that the Chinese regime&#x27;s strategy is to avoid arguing with skeptics of the party and the government, and to not even discuss controversial issues. We show that the goal of this massive secretive operation is instead to distract the public and change the subject, as most of the these posts involve cheerleading for China, the revolutionary history of the Communist Party, or other symbols of the regime.&quot;<p>Sensible. Cuts, however, against my mental caricature of an astroturfing shill.
评论 #17104360 未加载
评论 #17105866 未加载
评论 #17105776 未加载
kevintb将近 7 年前
great food for thought that applies to any public forum, whether it&#x27;s infected with these massive secret governmental operations or not.
vthallam将近 7 年前
T - 30 mins before this post gets buried. I don&#x27;t understand despite the high upvote count, why do articles critical of China are not able to be in the first page for more than a couple hours.<p>Also, China is the new Saudi Arabia. With the economic power, they can get away with anything and actually, you can&#x27;t do anything to stop that. Even Trump who was so critical wanted to help ZTE as soon as the Chinese asked for interference.
评论 #17104618 未加载
评论 #17105029 未加载
评论 #17104517 未加载
评论 #17104472 未加载
xster将近 7 年前
This is literally and exactly what Correct The Record (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Correct_the_Record" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Correct_the_Record</a>) is and is as standard as it gets in American political discourse online <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fec.gov&#x2F;data&#x2F;disbursements&#x2F;?two_year_transaction_period=2016&amp;disbursement_purpose_categories=other&amp;data_type=processed&amp;committee_id=C00578997&amp;min_date=01%2F01%2F2015&amp;max_date=08%2F05%2F2016" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fec.gov&#x2F;data&#x2F;disbursements&#x2F;?two_year_transaction...</a>.
评论 #17105853 未加载
equalunique将近 7 年前
Political entities linked to the US government do this too.
mike_n将近 7 年前
as if we don&#x27;t have our own Wag-the-Dog-ish distractions also?
评论 #17105837 未加载
malshe将近 7 年前
I can&#x27;t access it on Harvard website any more. Luckily the paper is already published so if you have access to the journal, download it here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cambridge.org&#x2F;core&#x2F;journals&#x2F;american-political-science-review&#x2F;article&#x2F;how-the-chinese-government-fabricates-social-media-posts-for-strategic-distraction-not-engaged-argument&#x2F;4662DB26E2685BAF1485F14369BD137C" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cambridge.org&#x2F;core&#x2F;journals&#x2F;american-political-s...</a>
评论 #17103643 未加载
评论 #17103734 未加载
foodislove将近 7 年前
The Chinese global trollism is getting worse. From Airlines who don&#x27;t label Taiwan under China to kids in primary school in Australia who paint a Taiwanese flag on a bull, the Chinese are really becoming more and more belligerent. The Chinese internet army of &quot;hurt feelings&quot; and stupid whataboutism and fake moral equivalence is entering HN as well.<p>Whenver there is any negative story about china, the downvotes happen immediately and &quot;defends of the honor of china&quot; pop up magically throwing dirt everywhere.<p>I&#x27;m sure when PG made this, having nationalistic Chinese trolls degrade the forum with their &quot;China is always right&quot; bs was probably not on the top of his mind.<p>I wonder if we can ask the mods. Is there a pattern of downvotes whenver there isa negative story about China? I wonder if a bunch of Tencent&#x2F;Alibaba &quot;patriotic chinese&quot; simply created lots of accounts and upvoted themselves to get to the point they can downvote across their accounts to &quot;keep the internet clean&quot; of anything that embarasses Xi Jinping and his stupid uneducated bimbo of a wife
评论 #17108727 未加载
评论 #17104361 未加载
评论 #17104276 未加载
评论 #17104328 未加载
评论 #17104379 未加载
评论 #17104344 未加载
评论 #17108080 未加载
jonathanyc将近 7 年前
We should definitely be wary of attempts by the Chinese government to distract from meaningful discussion. It’s worth remembering that leftist organizations in the US and around the world during the Cold War were sometimes funded by the Soviet Union.<p>At the same time, I am reminded of how organizations that in hindsight we know were definitely not funded by the Soviet Union were accused of exactly that during the 50s and 60s. For example, we now know that at one point the KGB and the FBI were concurrently running smear campaigns against MLK.<p>In that light, I’m skeptical of Lionsion’s motives in posting this. Yesterday he was rightfully called out by some including me for writing of Chinese internment camps in Xinjiang that<p>&gt; These camps appear to be the result of high-level Chinese government policy that explicitly targets this ethic group. There are no contemporary parallels in the US. If you think there are, do you think Obama was in on it? The US situation is unfortunate, but it&#x27;s more the result of poverty and lower-level racism, not a policy to imprison blacks.<p>The whataboutism in his last statement of course goes against the consensus of US academics studying criminal justice issues, the consensus of criminal justice advocates, as well as what (again, thanks to the passage of time) we now know about the deliberate decisions of politicians leading up to the War on Drugs:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aclu.org&#x2F;other&#x2F;race-war-drugs" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aclu.org&#x2F;other&#x2F;race-war-drugs</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnn.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;03&#x2F;23&#x2F;politics&#x2F;john-ehrlichman-richard-nixon-drug-war-blacks-hippie&#x2F;index.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnn.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;03&#x2F;23&#x2F;politics&#x2F;john-ehrlichman-rich...</a><p>I think Hacker News should place where we can have a civil discussions about issues. Thanks to the wonders of technology, we are able to have multiple (not just one!) threads and thus to discuss multiple topics. And as I have said previously, most of us can both walk and chew gum at the same time; if someone is unable to even read comments discussing US education reform on an article by an American looking at the Swedish education system, for example, without being “distracted,” I think that’s more of an issue for the easily-distracted person than for the discussants.<p>But the strange trend of accusing everyone who would like to discuss the relevance of an issue to the US of being funded by the Chinese government is as intellectually demeaning as it should be rhetorically suspect.<p>I’d be happy to prove that I’m an American citizen not funded by the Chinese or any other government, but I think that might be relatively hard to prove in a fair and respectful way over the Internet. On the other hand, it is much easier to look at someone’s public comment history and to see the unsettling trends there.<p>More generally, I’m getting tired of having to battle this recent uptick in China scaremongering on what used to be a much more reasonable forum. Lionsion’s account is very new, and I wonder if they are part of the recent influx of new users who have arrived with their own bad habits. Seriously, check the account creation date for users who post things that seem to be weird pro-China or anti-China propaganda. They seem to mostly have been made around 2016.
评论 #17108785 未加载
评论 #17105082 未加载
评论 #17105115 未加载
xmly将近 7 年前
How do you know it is not Russia? Maybe Russia is manipulating China and USA at the same time!
rajacombinator将近 7 年前
American govt fabricates wars for social distraction, China needs to step their game up!
pixelpp将近 7 年前
So does the US with it&#x27;s media machine.
评论 #17105813 未加载
meko将近 7 年前
I&#x27;m inclined not to trust an article that uses propaganda-rhetoric like &#x27;regime&#x27;.
评论 #17104551 未加载
notadoc将近 7 年前
Does anyone think this does not happen in other countries? Maybe even in your own country (but not ours, obviously)? And not just by governments, but by political parties, foreign entities, corporations, lobbying groups, interest groups, etc, any entity with an interest in distracting, muddying, defining a narrative, or swaying opinion?<p>And once you consider that, consider the numerous potential reasons why social media companies appear to do nothing about the huge numbers of obvious bots, astroturfers, sockpuppets, trollfarms, etc on their services.<p>Interesting times we live in!
评论 #17104550 未加载
评论 #17104305 未加载