科技回声

10 条评论

The fundamental annoyance I have is not only Amazon's (apparently) preferential pricing, but the e-Packet from China pricing.As a consumer I can see the advantage to me, but it seems wildly unfair to Mouser / Digikey and the 1000s of much smaller businesses in the USA to have to pay more to ship a small parcel from Denver CO to somewhere in CA, than an e-Packet from HongKong to e.g. Plattsburgh, NY. It has to be hurting the ability to compete of lots of US based businesses...

评论 #17107941 未加载

评论 #17107181 未加载

kumarvvr大约 7 年前

The invisible hand is now the wizened old hand of a cantankerous idiot.

评论 #17106416 未加载

Fjolsvith大约 7 年前

So Amazon will just pass the cost on to the customer, like any business would.

评论 #17106404 未加载

评论 #17106418 未加载

phoncible大约 7 年前

Ugh. I still order things from non-prime sellers, so that would hurt.

JudasGoat大约 7 年前

It might not have the effect President Trump anticipated. In my area (south eastern MA) Amazon has switched to it's own delivery system for the "last mile" at least. This will only accelerate this direction until the "Drones" takeover.

yogeshkhetani大约 7 年前

Can Trump have command over what USPS does with their business tactics?

whataretensors大约 7 年前

Then when Amazon creates a new distribution mechanism using AI they'll be surprised.I like the dream of decentralized delivery agents where no central authority can take a cut or intercede.Edit: What the hell, it turns out amazon deliveries are government subsidized to the tune of ~$1.5/each.

评论 #17106081 未加载

prolikewhoa大约 7 年前

Will someone please think of these poor & suffering record profit breaking Fortune 100 companies?

评论 #17107008 未加载

cprayingmantis大约 7 年前

I hope they do, the Amazon packages I get through USPS are often late. It’ll force Amazon to go with the quicker alternatives.

评论 #17106126 未加载

评论 #17106109 未加载

sir_stier大约 7 年前

Trump has repeatedly said without evidence that deliveries for Amazon were costing the service money...How about this article in the Wall Street journal and the analysis done by Citibank?<a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-the-post-office-gives-amazon-special-delivery-1522603826?mod=trending_now_1&tesla=y" rel="nofollow">https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-the-post-office-gives-amazo...</a>The Washington Examiner?<a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/for-every-amazon-package-it-delivers-the-postal-service-loses-146" rel="nofollow">https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/for-every-amazon-package-...</a>

评论 #17106333 未加载

10 条评论

patrickg_zill大约 7 年前

评论 #17107941 未加载

评论 #17107181 未加载

kumarvvr大约 7 年前

The invisible hand is now the wizened old hand of a cantankerous idiot.

评论 #17106416 未加载

Fjolsvith大约 7 年前

So Amazon will just pass the cost on to the customer, like any business would.

评论 #17106404 未加载

评论 #17106418 未加载

phoncible大约 7 年前

Ugh. I still order things from non-prime sellers, so that would hurt.

JudasGoat大约 7 年前

yogeshkhetani大约 7 年前

Can Trump have command over what USPS does with their business tactics?

whataretensors大约 7 年前

评论 #17106081 未加载

prolikewhoa大约 7 年前

Will someone please think of these poor & suffering record profit breaking Fortune 100 companies?

评论 #17107008 未加载

cprayingmantis大约 7 年前

I hope they do, the Amazon packages I get through USPS are often late. It’ll force Amazon to go with the quicker alternatives.

评论 #17106126 未加载

评论 #17106109 未加载

sir_stier大约 7 年前

评论 #17106333 未加载

Trump urged U.S.P.S to double package rates for Amazon: Washington Post

10 条评论

Trump urged U.S.P.S to double package rates for Amazon: Washington Post

10 条评论