TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Gnome has moved to GitLab

640 点作者 fiveFeet将近 7 年前

20 条评论

matttproud将近 7 年前
… and closed about a bazillion bugs I filed over the years in the process without (apparently) migrating them, too.<p>… though I am pretty sure they left the bugs in the source intact.
评论 #17201149 未加载
评论 #17199197 未加载
评论 #17199398 未加载
评论 #17200467 未加载
评论 #17199259 未加载
评论 #17199109 未加载
评论 #17199389 未加载
评论 #17199415 未加载
评论 #17200484 未加载
Slippery_John将近 7 年前
Unrelated, but GitLab has a pretty slick cookie notice. Tells you exactly what they&#x27;re doing and lets you opt out of non-essentials.
评论 #17199858 未加载
评论 #17199465 未加载
评论 #17199743 未加载
评论 #17202364 未加载
评论 #17200280 未加载
评论 #17199510 未加载
asdsa5325将近 7 年前
Here&#x27;s the link to the repos, which was strangely not included in the blog post:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gitlab.gnome.org&#x2F;explore&#x2F;groups" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gitlab.gnome.org&#x2F;explore&#x2F;groups</a>
评论 #17201030 未加载
评论 #17199138 未加载
orf将近 7 年前
The comparison between Phabricator and Gitlab is quite interesting: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.gnome.org&#x2F;Initiatives&#x2F;DevelopmentInfrastructure" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.gnome.org&#x2F;Initiatives&#x2F;DevelopmentInfrastructure</a>
hajile将近 7 年前
Now it&#x27;s time for them to move to Node.<p>They currently use the JS engine from Firefox 45 (over 2 years old) and are looking to move to 52 (almost 15 months old). Let&#x27;s not forget that the update before that was from FF25 which was from 2013.<p>It&#x27;s past time to port your stuff to N-API and actually allow devs to have access to standard dev tools using standard dev practices.<p>It would be a great change for Gnome devs too. Rather than spending weeks of dev time trying to shim in the latest SpiderMonkey version and make sure nothing broke, they could rely on N-API being stable, so they can focus instead on updating the JS interface to ES6+.
评论 #17202115 未加载
评论 #17205118 未加载
评论 #17203081 未加载
评论 #17199897 未加载
ufo将近 7 年前
The new gitlab setup is lovely. Browsing the source code and bugs&#x2F;issues is much more pleasant than it was before. It is giving me an itch to contribute to GNOME somehow.
bionoid将近 7 年前
The actual GitLab instance appears to be at [1], I couldn&#x27;t find this in the link or the gnome.org announcement.<p>Good news, though! I am hopeful it can help lower the barrier to entry.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gitlab.gnome.org&#x2F;GNOME" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gitlab.gnome.org&#x2F;GNOME</a>
itsadok将近 7 年前
The last time I evaluated GitLab, you needed the paid version to use features that I considered pretty basic, like merge request approvals and multiple code reviewers[1]. I&#x27;m wondering now if the GNOME people consider these unnecessary, or if I misunderstood what was possible with self hosting.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;about.gitlab.com&#x2F;pricing&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;about.gitlab.com&#x2F;pricing&#x2F;</a>
评论 #17203768 未加载
buster将近 7 年前
If only all of the energy spent on Gnome bashing would be spent on bugfixing, we&#x27;d have a perfect Gnome desktop by now. It&#x27;s sad.
评论 #17203924 未加载
评论 #17204022 未加载
parvenu74将近 7 年前
Was Github ruled out because it&#x27;s not free enough in spirit or are the Gnome folks just wanting to run things on-prem?
评论 #17199631 未加载
评论 #17199261 未加载
评论 #17199205 未加载
评论 #17202826 未加载
评论 #17200466 未加载
yrro将近 7 年前
This is very annoying because I can no longer see the list of bugs I filed against GNOME products. They are all owned by &#x27;bugzilla-migration&#x27;, not me!<p>[additional] I appear to be subscribed to the issues that I filed in Bugzilla and were migrated to GitLab, but there&#x27;s no way to get a list of all the issues I&#x27;m subscribed to: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gitlab.com&#x2F;gitlab-org&#x2F;gitlab-ce&#x2F;issues&#x2F;12697" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gitlab.com&#x2F;gitlab-org&#x2F;gitlab-ce&#x2F;issues&#x2F;12697</a>
confounded将近 7 年前
Fantastic news!
gsklee将近 7 年前
I guess we know why now: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=17221527" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=17221527</a>
sebastian将近 7 年前
Highly unrelated (and lots of reasons missing): I was never a fan of Gnome and for years ended up &quot;just going with LXDE instead&quot; until I gave Budgie a try about 6 months ago. I have never been happier in my life.
cdmckay将近 7 年前
Where was it before?
评论 #17199079 未加载
评论 #17199040 未加载
评论 #17199044 未加载
评论 #17199043 未加载
merb将近 7 年前
it feels so slow to browse anything on this gitlab...
shmerl将近 7 年前
I&#x27;m waiting for Mesa to move to Gitlab too.
sdsdsdsdsdsds将近 7 年前
Slightly related, Does anyone have a virtual machine image of Ghome-Development environment that I can use straight away. I am on a corporate RHEL 6 machine, so it has been very tough to be able to get the development environment up and running there.<p>I am not even able to mame changes to gnome-terminator 1XX version because of this.
评论 #17200928 未加载
评论 #17201417 未加载
sumedh将近 7 年前
&gt; Carlson proved in 1938 that this process was viable, using moss spores for toner. But when he pitched it to Kodak, General Electric Co., and other tech giants of the day, the response was, as he later put it, “an enthusiastic lack of interest.”<p>Another story where the inventor goes to big companies to sell the product and they dont take him seriously which is kind of funny when Xerox became a big corp, it did not take the GUI&#x2F;Ethernet created by their people seriously.
robinhood将近 7 年前
Too bad GitHub was out of the question just because it&#x27;s not open source. I don&#x27;t think there is a single platform out there that has done more for the open source community than GitHub. Most of the great OSS projects are on it and it helped democratize open source participation by providing a very nice UI and a set of robust tools that simply didn&#x27;t exist before.
评论 #17201285 未加载
评论 #17201708 未加载
评论 #17202363 未加载